Originally Posted by
sloth
I'm not talking about special relativity. I'm talking about your comment:
You can tell, because *your comment* was the subject of my sentence. See, the "subject" of a sentence is what the sentence is about! Isn't that neat to know!?
Your comment is flawed, regardless of what spcial relativity says, and regardless, even, of what the subject of your comment was. Even if the subject of your statement had been "toasters" it would still have been flawed.
The statement: "Nothing can travel faster than the speed of light because the speed of light is (the speed of light in a vacuum)." is flawed.
This is because the fact that the speed of light = the speed of light is not sufficient evidence that nothing can move faster than this speed. Even if there is further evidence that nothing can move faster than the speed of light, it does not factor in here, because you did not state such evidence as being the reason that nothing can travel faster than the speed of light. You stated that nothing can travel than the speed of light because the speed of light is the speed of light.
I am aware that the speed of light is the speed of light. It's very fast. Like a racecar! :D
Did you know that racecar spelled backwards is still racecar?
That's because the driver is going SO FAST that he doesn't know whether he's coming or going!
Isn't that neato!?