I like how 60% of your post was mocking religion. That was my favorite part. |
|
BBC News - Cancer survival: Macmillan hails major improvement |
|
I like how 60% of your post was mocking religion. That was my favorite part. |
|
Thanks but I know I can do better. |
|
And then they die after 6 years, having gone through 5 extra years of pain and suffering. Great improvement. |
|
|
|
Pain caused by some cancer related illnesses are very manageable these days. Stay informed. In regards to stress - it's bad...but the person enduring it, likely wants to remain alive. |
|
I stomp on your ideas.
You confused radiation therapy with the doctors and researchers who dedicate their lives to develop and use such technologies, but yes, it is rather, isn't it? |
|
Last edited by Xei; 11-22-2011 at 11:24 PM.
They represent that do they? How would you know? They could spend the extra years barely hanging on. That happens a lot. It's not uncommon for people to spend years in a hospital getting treatment. |
|
oh here let me post a one word answer too.... coz I wanna be pithy but I'm actually not.... |
|
Why do you argue so much tommo? |
|
Because I'm really lonely and insecure in myself. |
|
Last edited by tommo; 11-23-2011 at 01:18 PM.
I meant that Xei meant that. It's the only interpretation of what he said that I can see making sense. |
|
Grandma died of cancer, grandpa had cancer, i watched someone literally die of cancer infront of me (a week leading up to the death). Fuck off cancer. |
|
It shouldn't be the case that imaginary people who do nothing have billions of followers yet people who spend their lives and can actually make a huge difference are unappreciated. |
|
I can only assume these researchers are very much appreciated, winning awards, the love of their patients and families and obtaining financial success. |
|
Everything works out in the end, sometimes even badly.
Because they're thanking jesus, or god or whatever. Not the researchers. |
|
Last edited by tommo; 11-25-2011 at 03:53 AM.
I think that this perspective is a bit off. |
|
Previously PhilosopherStoned
Actually if you counted all the words (including the title, not concluding the words in the link, those two words connected by a dash and only counting a contraction as one word) divided it by the number in the second paragraph of the op then the percentage was 59.72% |
|
"For a long time it gave me nightmares, having to witness an injustice like that. It was a constant reminder of how unfair this world can be, I can still hear them taunting him. 'Silly Rabbit, Trix are for kids!'... How come they just couldn't give him some cereal?"
Bookmarks