Energy is the ability to 'do work'. Doing work means applying a force over a distance. |
|
We use the word 'energy' a lot in all fields of science, but what is it? How do we define it? I find that it is actually quite difficult to pin down a specific definition, because it can come in many difference guises. |
|
Energy is the ability to 'do work'. Doing work means applying a force over a distance. |
|
What is an electromagnetic field? |
|
Everything works out in the end, sometimes even badly.
It's a kind of combination of electric fields and magnetic fields, which describe vectors at every point in space, characterising the electromagnetic forces due in general to moving charges. |
|
Can you give me an example of how this works? |
|
Everything works out in the end, sometimes even badly.
Sure, imagine a point charge of strength Q at the origin. This creates an electric field defined by vectors at every point other than the origin of length Q/kr^2 where r is the distance from the origin, pointing outwards from the origin. These describe the force on a unit point charge. I hope you learned a lot today. |
|
Not yet. Please use laymen's terms. |
|
Everything works out in the end, sometimes even badly.
I was using layman's terms. You can look all of them on Wikipedia, they are simple concepts. |
|
The electromagnetic and nuclear forces applied over a distance? |
|
Energy is kind of hard to pin down. The question of "what is it?" is especially interesting because of the fact that it's quantized. Pauli's Exclusion principle shows these discrete levels have some real, awesome, and diverse consequences. |
|
|
|
Everything works out in the end, sometimes even badly.
Erm... good for you bro. |
|
I don't think you understand half the shit you know. |
|
Everything works out in the end, sometimes even badly.
For some reason I find this thread and Xei's reactions, and people's reactions to his posts in general, fucking hilarious. |
|
Clearly your idea of clearly is a matter of opinion. I got the impression that you were listing qualities and giving book definitions but were unable to describe what an EM field actually is, in reality. This is a classic activity by people that don't understand what they've learned. You spent too much time writing down answers and not enough time considering what they mean. |
|
Last edited by Omnis Dei; 12-25-2011 at 08:48 AM.
Everything works out in the end, sometimes even badly.
You must be talking about the whole scientific community then, because that's the definition of a field. |
|
>.> |
|
Everything works out in the end, sometimes even badly.
How else would you explain something? |
|
I'd use terminology that more effectively conveys the idea rather than define it, such as an example. |
|
Everything works out in the end, sometimes even badly.
Right. That part made no sense to me. That's why I had to look it up on my own and ended up posting the link to what I looked up in order to help other people who also couldn't comprehend what an EM field was or how it works based on that definition. I don't see how anyone can read that and take meaning from it unless they've already taken a lecture. I find Xei's description vague at best. |
|
Last edited by Omnis Dei; 12-25-2011 at 09:29 AM.
Everything works out in the end, sometimes even badly.
Bookmarks