• Lucid Dreaming - Dream Views




    Results 1 to 17 of 17
    Like Tree4Likes
    • 1 Post By TimeDragon97
    • 2 Post By Carabas
    • 1 Post By Xei

    Thread: MinutePhysics - Science, Religion, and the Big Bang

    1. #1
      Homo sapiens sapiens Achievements:
      Referrer Bronze Created Dream Journal Tagger First Class 1000 Hall Points Veteran Second Class
      TimeDragon97's Avatar
      Join Date
      Jun 2013
      LD Count
      4 or 5
      Gender
      Location
      Rochester, NY
      Posts
      268
      Likes
      144
      DJ Entries
      44

      MinutePhysics - Science, Religion, and the Big Bang

      Carabas likes this.
      ERROR 404: SIGNATURE NOT FOUND

    2. #2
      Diamonds And Rust Achievements:
      Veteran First Class Vivid Dream Journal Referrer Bronze Populated Wall 5000 Hall Points Made lots of Friends on DV Tagger First Class
      Darkmatters's Avatar
      Join Date
      Dec 2009
      Gender
      Location
      Center of the universe
      Posts
      6,952
      Likes
      5837
      DJ Entries
      172
      At the end he should have said it was a cyclical idea of the universe, which correlates to much earlier religions than Christianity, such as Hinduism.

    3. #3
      Member Achievements:
      Made Friends on DV 1000 Hall Points Veteran Second Class
      TiredPhil's Avatar
      Join Date
      Mar 2011
      Posts
      492
      Likes
      300
      A question for Big Bang scientists, scholars, believers.

      The distance between galaxies is said to be expanding at this moment in time.
      For some reason each galaxy is actualy moving faster, and faster away.
      Put this model in an animation, and run it forward. After a while we would be vast distances apart, and travelling at much faster speeds.

      Now here is the bit I do not understand.
      Put the animation in reverse, and run it for a while. We would be much closer together, but travelling at very, very slow speeds.
      This puts the idea of the age of the universe at much older than we are led to believe.

      Why is the age of the universe calculated some other way ?

    4. #4
      Member Achievements:
      Tagger First Class Vivid Dream Journal 5000 Hall Points Veteran Second Class
      Carabas's Avatar
      Join Date
      Jul 2013
      Posts
      47
      Likes
      134
      DJ Entries
      342
      The rate of expansion is accounted for when calculating the age of the universe. What do you mean by 'some other way'?

    5. #5
      Oneironaut Achievements:
      Made lots of Friends on DV Vivid Dream Journal Referrer Bronze Tagger First Class Populated Wall Veteran Second Class 1000 Hall Points
      <span class='glow_9400D3'>OneUp</span>'s Avatar
      Join Date
      Aug 2013
      LD Count
      1+ Every Night
      Gender
      Location
      Houston, Texas
      Posts
      689
      Likes
      827
      DJ Entries
      269
      Interesting how in a sense, the big bang created order in a way, and life out of nothing

    6. #6
      Member Achievements:
      Made Friends on DV 1000 Hall Points Veteran Second Class
      TiredPhil's Avatar
      Join Date
      Mar 2011
      Posts
      492
      Likes
      300
      Quote Originally Posted by Carabas View Post
      The rate of expansion is accounted for when calculating the age of the universe. What do you mean by 'some other way'?
      Well if going back in time. -
      You have a big bang, everything moves at phenominal speeds outwards.
      The rate of expansion then slows down to a trickle.
      Then the rate of expansion speeds up again, and continues to accelerate.
      In fact it continues to accelerate for billions of years.

      Is this science ? NO it is an unproven theory.
      Lots of information out there is only theory.
      It seems, as sheep, we are fed a great deal of theories, and take them as fact.

    7. #7
      Member Achievements:
      Tagger First Class Vivid Dream Journal 5000 Hall Points Veteran Second Class
      Carabas's Avatar
      Join Date
      Jul 2013
      Posts
      47
      Likes
      134
      DJ Entries
      342
      The word 'theory' in science is a technical term, it doesn't mean 'unproven' the way it does in common usage. It's pretty much the opposite. 'Explanation' would be a better definition. A scientific theory means a model or a formula that describes the facts we have and makes predictions that have been tested and found accurate. If something hasn't been tested, it's called a hypothesis, not a theory.

      So when you hear gravity or relativity or the Big Bang being called a theory, it doesn't mean we're unsure about it. It means it's a reliable way of describing and predicting the way the world works.
      TimeDragon97 and StephL like this.

    8. #8
      Xei
      UnitedKingdom Xei is offline
      Banned
      Join Date
      Aug 2005
      Posts
      9,984
      Likes
      3082
      Quote Originally Posted by TiredPhil View Post
      A question for Big Bang scientists, scholars, believers.

      The distance between galaxies is said to be expanding at this moment in time.
      For some reason each galaxy is actualy moving faster, and faster away.
      Put this model in an animation, and run it forward. After a while we would be vast distances apart, and travelling at much faster speeds.

      Now here is the bit I do not understand.
      Put the animation in reverse, and run it for a while. We would be much closer together, but travelling at very, very slow speeds.
      This puts the idea of the age of the universe at much older than we are led to believe.

      Why is the age of the universe calculated some other way ?
      Your logic is flawed... there is no way to deduce from what you say that at the beginning things were moving at "very very slow speeds". As a matter of fact things were moving very fast. Just because things are accelerating away from each other today... it does not somehow follow that they were not moving back when they were closer together.

    9. #9
      Member
      Join Date
      Feb 2004
      Posts
      5,165
      Likes
      709
      If the speed in which everything is spreading apart is increasing(which it seems to be doing), then the idea of of the big crunch where everything will be pulled back together, seems unlikely.

    10. #10
      Member Achievements:
      Made Friends on DV 1000 Hall Points Veteran Second Class
      TiredPhil's Avatar
      Join Date
      Mar 2011
      Posts
      492
      Likes
      300
      Quote Originally Posted by Xei View Post
      Your logic is flawed... there is no way to deduce from what you say that at the beginning things were moving at "very very slow speeds". As a matter of fact things were moving very fast. Just because things are accelerating away from each other today... it does not somehow follow that they were not moving back when they were closer together.
      If something is now going faster, and is accelerating, then it is getting faster. Y/N ?
      This means that it was previously going slower.
      How can this logic be flawed.

    11. #11
      Xei
      UnitedKingdom Xei is offline
      Banned
      Join Date
      Aug 2005
      Posts
      9,984
      Likes
      3082
      In at least two severe ways. One, because "slower" is not the same thing as "very, very slow speeds", and two, "previously" is not the same thing as "at the beginning of time".

    12. #12
      Member Achievements:
      Made Friends on DV 1000 Hall Points Veteran Second Class
      TiredPhil's Avatar
      Join Date
      Mar 2011
      Posts
      492
      Likes
      300
      peĚdanĚtic

    13. #13
      Xei
      UnitedKingdom Xei is offline
      Banned
      Join Date
      Aug 2005
      Posts
      9,984
      Likes
      3082
      You should probably look that word up, because it doesn't mean "pointing out a colossal error".

      Seriously, grow up.

    14. #14
      Member Achievements:
      Made Friends on DV 1000 Hall Points Veteran Second Class
      TiredPhil's Avatar
      Join Date
      Mar 2011
      Posts
      492
      Likes
      300
      Sorry, I have grown up now. Is that better ?

      Would you like me to admit my point of view is wrong, and yours is right ?
      Would you like me to take back all my arguements ?
      Are you getting frustrated that I will not agree with you.

      Well my apologies, but my opinion is staying exactly as it is.
      Stop getting too excited about it all. After all, its all just a game.

      I have noticed a trend on here for some to get all bothered, if anybody else does not agree with their point of view.
      You should be like the majority of members, and relax once in a while.
      Your opinion is valid, but it is not your opinion. It is something you read in a book, or saw on the internet.
      Be original, and I will argue with you further, but getting silly quotes off the internet will no longer illicit a reply.
      And above all, stop with the insults.

    15. #15
      Xei
      UnitedKingdom Xei is offline
      Banned
      Join Date
      Aug 2005
      Posts
      9,984
      Likes
      3082
      Yeahhh... people being chilled out doesn't mean they have to just roll over when you decide to be petulant with them.
      TiredPhil likes this.

    16. #16
      Member Achievements:
      Made Friends on DV 1000 Hall Points Veteran Second Class
      TiredPhil's Avatar
      Join Date
      Mar 2011
      Posts
      492
      Likes
      300
      Funny
      Not great that you have resorted to name calling.
      But it's what I expected.
      Oh well. Have fun with this topic, I am now unsubscribed, and will not be adding any more comments.

    17. #17
      Xei
      UnitedKingdom Xei is offline
      Banned
      Join Date
      Aug 2005
      Posts
      9,984
      Likes
      3082
      Cool. I recommend for your future posting that you probably shouldn't dish out acerbic comments if you're not mature enough to take 'em in return without feeling indignantly violated.

    Similar Threads

    1. If Religion / Science Never Existed..
      By Jeff777 in forum Religion/Spirituality
      Replies: 49
      Last Post: 04-10-2010, 04:33 PM
    2. Religion vs Science
      By sourcejedi in forum Religion/Spirituality
      Replies: 3
      Last Post: 08-18-2007, 02:54 AM
    3. Science And Religion
      By JaphyR in forum Religion/Spirituality
      Replies: 1
      Last Post: 12-20-2006, 09:12 PM
    4. Is science a religion?
      By LewisM in forum Philosophy
      Replies: 22
      Last Post: 03-31-2005, 02:27 AM
    5. science vs. religion
      By jacobo in forum Philosophy
      Replies: 41
      Last Post: 05-31-2004, 05:53 AM

    Tags for this Thread

    Bookmarks

    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    •