532*65=??

Printable View

04-26-2005, 10:15 PM
Merck

532*65=??

34580.00
04-27-2005, 08:08 AM
Hate

Congratulations! You know how to use a calculator!
04-27-2005, 08:18 AM
Kaniaz

Yeah...you're really clever? :|
04-27-2005, 11:32 AM
Stalker

Skip the zeros after the decimal point.

(Btw. I did that multiplication in my head before opening the thread, just for the fun of it :eh: )
04-27-2005, 01:20 PM
Mystical_Journey

:rainbow:

1+2=3

I didnt even have to use one of those electronic machines.
04-30-2005, 07:19 PM
SantaDreamsToo

Re: 532*65=??

Quote:

Originally posted by Merck
34580.0000000000000000000000

amazing! I want to be able to do that!
05-03-2005, 10:29 PM
Amethyst Star

In the mind of Zamyatin, "What if two and two don't equal four?"
05-04-2005, 02:29 PM
Hate

OCT: 532*65=43642
HEX: 523*65=20CBA
05-05-2005, 02:55 AM
muse.v

BIN:532*65=1000011100010100

___________1000010100
*_____________1000001

(ignoring times by zero)

____________10000100
+________10000010000
+___1000001000000000
=___1000011100010100
05-05-2005, 03:39 AM
Yume

Emoticon

:D = 0
:) = 1
:( = 2
:o = 3
:shock: = 4
:? = 5
8) =6
:lol: = 7
:P = 8
:-P = 9

:? :o :(
X 8) :?
----------------
:o :shock: :? :P :D
05-05-2005, 04:24 AM
muse.v

:goodjob2:

Who pulls faces instead of numbers? Maths class would give you repetative strain injuries to the cheeks...
05-05-2005, 06:50 AM
Yume

Quote:

Originally posted by muse.v
:goodjob2:

Who pulls faces instead of numbers? Maths class would give you repetative strain injuries to the cheeks...

This is advanced math you only learn at the highest European Universities. 8)
05-05-2005, 08:00 AM
Hate

Quote:

Originally posted by muse.v
BIN:532*65=1000011100010100

___________1000010100
*_____________1000001

(ignoring times by zero)

____________10000100
+________10000010000
+___1000001000000000
=___1000011100010100

Huh? I didn't know you can multiply 532 and 65 in binary. How come? I thought you can only use 1 and 0
05-07-2005, 01:30 PM
muse.v

yeah its cool. Apparrently if you multiply the ones and zeros the answer still works. Its even easier too, because you're only doing ones and zeros. You just have to carry it to the next column if it's two.

Read this, its REALLY simple, and explains it much better than i can. http://www.garlikov.com/Soc_Meth.html :lol:
05-07-2005, 10:00 PM
Stalker

Quote:

Originally posted by muse.v
yeah its cool. Apparrently if you multiply the ones and zeros the answer still works. Its even easier too, because you're only doing ones and zeros. You just have to carry it to the next column if it's two.

Read this, its REALLY simple, and explains it much better than i can. http://www.garlikov.com/Soc_Meth.html :lol:

I think what Hate meant was that you can't multiply 532 and 65, even though you can multiply 1000010100 and 1000001, since 532 and 65 doesn't exist in binary.
05-08-2005, 08:43 AM
muse.v

:hrm:

Isn't that obvious anyway? I know you can't multiply "532" and "65" in binary. That's like multiplying "æ®}" and "°µ§" in base ten.
05-08-2005, 12:29 PM
Hate

That might be obvious but the point is that you're multiplying 532 and 65 as that's what stands in the topic. You don't just take the answer and convert it to a different system because then it's not 532*65 in that system anymore :wink:
05-10-2005, 08:45 AM
muse.v

I do not agree with your point.

Quote:

Originally posted by Hate+--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Hate)</div>

Quote:

You don't just take the answer and convert it to a different system because then it's not 532*65 in that system anymore[/b]

You did the same thing:
<!--QuoteBegin-Hate
OCT: 532*65=43642
HEX: 523*65=20CBA

I had a much longer post, but i don't think its nessesary because there's simply nothing wrong with me using binary. You can not argue with that if you used Octal and Hexidecimal.
05-10-2005, 01:34 PM
Merck

I liked the smiley math language.
05-10-2005, 01:42 PM
Hate

Quote:

Originally posted by muse.v+--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(muse.v)</div>

Quote:

You did the same thing:
<!--QuoteBegin-hate

Quote:

OCT: 532*65=43642
HEX: 523*65=20CBA

[/b]

Actually I didn't. If I'd just take the answer and convert it to octal and hexadecimal it'd give me the following answers: 34580 = 8714 (HEX) and 103424 (OCT). I don't convert the numbers you need for the calculation. I turn my TI-86 into hexadecimal or octal mode, input "532*65" and press 'enter'. If I try to do that in binary mode I get "error 08 number base" because binary doesn't support numbers apart from 1 and 0.
05-11-2005, 02:20 AM
muse.v

Oh, i see!

I agree i can't actually use the same symbols, as you did. I can see that you kept the symbols consistent to the title of the thread, when i thought you were keeping the values consistent.

When i read your post i interpreted the left side of the equals to still be in decimal, because i had thought if you were to change it all, you would've written 532*65 differently. I assumed that your answer was equal to 34580. I didn't check the answer, and i cant read hexidecimal or octal. I hadn't realised until now that we had done different things. So, when i posted, i kept the left side in decimal, as i thought you had done the same. :D

For the sake of it:

DEC :532*65=34580
HEX: 214*41=8714
OCT: 1024*101=103424
BIN: 1000010100*1000001=1000011100010100

oh, and these:
DEC: :? :o :( * 8) :? = :o :shock: :? :P :D
HEX: :( :) :shock: * :shock: :) = :P :lol: :) :shock:
OCT: :) :D :( :shock: * :) :D :) = :) :D :o :shock: :) :shock:
BIN: :) :D :D :D :D :) :D :) :D :D * :) :D :D :D :D :D :) = :) :D :D :D :D :) :) :) :D :D :D :) :D :) :D :D