Excuse me? My alignment? Sir, I am offended that you'd ask.
Printable View
Excuse me? My alignment? Sir, I am offended that you'd ask.
I'd actually dispute Robin Hood being Chaotic Good. Sure, he robbed from the rich and crusaded against the established order, but it was all to reinstate himself into his own lawful post of nobility.
Actually, it is possible. I once had a druid who was Good-Evil.Quote:
Or possibly Chaotic Conflicted (it would be nice if there was a way to classify neutral characters who, instead of being neither good nor evil, were good and evil).
She was a dwarf, who can actually make hecka good druids!
In D&D there are a number of good-evil druids and chaotic-lawful druids.
Anyway, she wouldn't be conflicted as much as so devoted and singleminded that hurting others, (even totally unneccassarily) for the sake of your cause is totally possible, as is making great and noble sacrifice.
I'm somewhat lawful-neutral in that I am into order and following laws but also am ready to defy establishment when it violates my beliefs.
I'm neutral good in that I try and do things that help make others lives better and easier and generally try and be kind but my life is not focused around helping people as much it should be.
Somewhere between lawful-neutral and neutral-good. What would that count as?