Is there a freeware program that's better?
Printable View
Is there a freeware program that's better?
Better? no, not really.
Free'er? Try OpenOffice.org (yeah, that's the name of it.) I know Google was working on one too, I'm not sure if they released it yet. I'm sure neither one has the functionality of Word, but I'm also sure that both are less annoying and have most of the capabilities of Word.
As far as I know, OO.o can do everything Word can, and then some. It's what I use personally. There are also a few variants of OpenOffice out there, I think IBM has one that's supposed to have better looks and more features. I read a brief snippet about it in PC World's (or it could have been PC Magazine, not sure) top freeware programs article this month. I'll look it up real quick and see if I can get more info on it.Quote:
Originally Posted by ninja9578
Edit: Here it is, IBM Lotus Symphony.
Depends on what "better" means to you. There's definitely free stuff, and a lot of it is just as good, just... different. The biggest problem with Office replacements is that documents written in the latest MS will always be incompatible... then again, with their latest version of office, they seem to have made sure that backwards compatibility with their own product is a tall order.
MS has been forced by the EU to open up the implementation specs for OOXML (the file format for Office 2007)
licence issues aside (of which there are many issues, but I won't go into this),
you should see OOXML filters in OO.o in the near future
I believe that OOo can read docx files.
Technically speaking, LaTeX is the best, but it's got a pretty steep learning curve and the spell checker will pick up all of the formatting stuff as erogenous.
it's happened already, thenQuote:
Originally Posted by ninja9578
seems I'm a bit behind
Funny thing, the deal Novell signed with MS was for precisely this
Interoperability with ooxml & various server side protocols
which the EU rulings have made redundant
TexMacs is free and produces high quality output.
But yes, OOo is the free-word processor of choice, although it is horrendously inefficient (that's Sun/Java for you).
Why is OOo inefficient?
It isn't... :|
It's got a lot of Java in it and it has it's own spelling and grammar checker, it doesn't use the operating system's.Quote:
Originally Posted by Omnius Deus
Unless you are working with very large (full length novels) or very heavily formatted files then you shouldn't really notice it.
Java is no different (broadly speaking) from any .Net language, performance wise
MS's Java VM is crap, though
Something running on a VM will always be slower than something running natively. Most Java VMs do fully compile parts of the code, but even that takes time.
I think the biggest thing that I disliked was the spell checker.
There's always AbiWord, too. I keep AbiWord Portable on my flash drive that goes everywhere I go, just in case. :D
:lmao:
Lol. With a bit of photoshop skills that could be easily turned into:Quote:
Originally Posted by ExoByte
"Microsoft's Weird
Fucks up ur system n shit, yo"
incidentally,
OpenOffice 2.4 was released the other day
I would just use Word.