you must be misinformed..?
Printable View
you must be misinformed..?
No he wasn'tQuote:
you were supposed to lock this D:
i requested a lock :crying:
just before the inevitable lock - the 400-pound 'happy Buddha' portrayal is mainly a touristic version. There are plenty of 'skinny Buddhas' and more so, there is no specific image of - and that's good (and honest) that way - of Buddha generally. Just do a quick google image search on 'Siddhartha' as opposed to 'happy buddha' and you will see what I mean. (obviously mainly directed @jeff)
The fat happy Buddha statue that you see in Chinese restaurants is not The Buddha. He was a mythical Taoist monk named "Budei" and hence the confusion. The Buddha was thin because he was a beggar. He even fasted until he almost died and there are cool statues of him all skin and bones, like a skeleton in lotus posture with long hair. A bit of history: originally there were no images or statues of the Buddha. It was the Greek ex-patriots living in India who started making images and statues of the Buddha. You see, the Hindu society would not except the Greeks because you have to be born a Hindu into the caste system, so the Greeks became Buddhists and continued their art. It was these Greeks who came back from India to Greece with a whole new set of philosophical ideas which gave rise to Greek philosophy including logic and rationality.
You can never win me in an argument.
When arguing, do you care more about winning, or more about the truth.
Put another way, ever tell your interlocutor an even better point for him to make?
In before jeff makes another pricelessly dumb comment
I think he has a point. When stating an opinion, you immediately put yourself in the position of being the ideal defender of that opinion. It's inevitable.
How would you feel about hearing an obese man preach about health? How would you feel about a smoker complaining about what a terrible problem smoking is for the environement?
It's extremely fundamental to question others if their actions are not in accordance with what comes out of their mouths.
Edit: What was the point of this thread again?
It's important to question others, period. If their actions don't match their answers, you know not to believe their answers.
But Buddha was not stuck on the disciplinary polarity in the first place so not only was Jeff's assumption about his actual weight off but so is his assumption about Buddhism. Buddha promoted the middle way, a balance between discipline and enjoyment. His actions were consistent with this philosophy. Besides, if I were to choose a role-model, I'd pick the happy looking guy who's always chillin and laughing, not the sad looking guy nailed to a cross.
But you're totally right about reactionary opposites. I even felt the need to clarify your argument though we essentially agree.
YOU'RE ALL WRONG. (Boom. Argument shifted.)
Why did you create it in the first place?
iunno :(