Originally Posted by
The Cusp
Assuming OBE's are just dreams, and that and that OBEers and LDers experience the same thing and operate in the same realm, what do you think are the pros and cons of each approach?
Both methods have been extensively researched by practitioners, and merging the knowledge from both schools could prove very informative. OBE research has probably gone on longer than LD research, simply because the term lucid dream only came into existance in the early 19ht century. I suspect OBE lore has better WILDing techniques than most LD oriented ones.
One on the main differences in the approaches is that OBEers think what they are experiencing is real. LDers obviously know it's not.
I would think that knowing it's only a dream would allow you more freedom to act, and more possiblilities to choose from. But perhaps thinking it's real would lend you more dedication to practicing. You'd certainly take it more seriously. And thinking it's an OBE would give the whole experience a more magical quality, while LDing is just some humdrum peculiarity of the mind that anyone can do. That could certainly inspire you more.
And even if thinking it's an OBE does restrict your options a little, I think it would provide some stability to your dream realm that regular LDers lack. The astral realm comes with all kinds of rules and things that are supposed to be there, as well as certain predefined interactions which can be expected. This creates better defined archetypes compared to the vast randomness of possibilities in LDs, which in my opinion makes for greater reliability in any feats you attempt.
There has got to be a ton of comparable techniques between OBEs and LDs, whicn ones are better. I'd like to start comparing them in this thread, but it's too late to start that tonight.