Printable View
yeah this movie is up in the air. the characters were interesting and so were the graphics, but the story was choppy and corney. now i know this was based on a comic book but i was just making an observation. -- the movie was entertaining, that's what i have to say about it. 2.5/5 :shakehead2:
hahaha
hahahaha
sorry, i should let you in on this, at first i thought you were talking about a infamous porno movie called sin city.
Sorry for being childish, ill be getting sin city soon too so ill post what i think of it when i see it sometime this week. (the movie)
Before you ask, no i havnt seen the porno version
Liar; Damascus was the main character!Quote:
Originally posted by Damascus
Before you ask, no i havnt seen the porno version
:P
Great movie. I'd give this one a 4.5/5.Quote:
Originally posted by adidas
yeah this movie is up in the air. the characters were interesting and so were the graphics, but the story was choppy and corney. now i know this was based on a comic book but i was just making an observation. -- the movie was entertaining, that's what i have to say about it. 2.5/5
The visuals were beyond impressive. Movies like Spider-Man and X-Men piss me off with their constant use of CGI that contribrutes nothing to the movie other than attempting to "wow" the audience.
The visuals in this movie however weren't simply an issue of cosmetics. This movie was technically "based on a comic book", but in reality it was a comic book, injected with life. The endless and extreme violence just contributes to this atmosphere.
The only criticism I have is the story. While Pulp Fiction nicely tied its three seperate stories together, Sin City left them a little more independent.
I saw the movie. I loved the visuals like Brady said. The storyline left much to be desired though. My father fell asleep next to me during the movie so it was kind of annoying with him so close to me. I liked the way the some of the characters were developed. The director really showed the characters in a way that made me happy. The director used what he had. I think that I would give it a 3.5/5.
As for the naked women it wasn't such a big deal. I have seen so many in real life that it doesn't matter to me. The way people feel when they see a naked person amazes me. My friends and I walk around each others houses naked all the time.
Totally agree. Loved it.Quote:
Originally posted by bradybaker+--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(bradybaker)</div>Quote:
<!--QuoteBegin-adidas
Great movie. I'd give this one a 4.5/5.Quote:
yeah this movie is up in the air. the characters were interesting and so were the graphics, but the story was choppy and corney. now i know this was based on a comic book but i was just making an observation. -- the movie was entertaining, that's what i have to say about it. 2.5/5
The visuals were beyond impressive. Movies like Spider-Man and X-Men piss me off with their constant use of CGI that contribrutes nothing to the movie other than attempting to \"wow\" the audience.
The visuals in this movie however weren't simply an issue of cosmetics. This movie was technically \"based on a comic book\", but in reality it was a comic book, injected with life. The endless and extreme violence just contributes to this atmosphere.
The only criticism I have is the story. While Pulp Fiction nicely tied its three seperate stories together, Sin City left them a little more independent.[/b]