U.S. District Court Rules Iran Behind 9/11 Attacks - Bloomberg
I hear those war drums a'beatin'. :shakehead2:
Can anybody confirm this? I haven't seen anything on mainstream news about it (though I'm not really expecting to yet. Lol).
Printable View
U.S. District Court Rules Iran Behind 9/11 Attacks - Bloomberg
I hear those war drums a'beatin'. :shakehead2:
Can anybody confirm this? I haven't seen anything on mainstream news about it (though I'm not really expecting to yet. Lol).
http://static.tumblr.com/u7iz7qs/0Rr...-chan-meme.png
But on a more serious note... Are you KIDDING me? This is why you can't trust politicians; be they Republicans or Democrats, all of them will jump on a good war bandwagon, bunch of fucking hawks. I'd like to say, c'mon people, yes you may not like Ron Paul for everything... but really, really consider not being stupid and wasting your votes. Please, do it for the children.
My heart goes out to the Iranians. May they remain strong while our terrorist armies invade their land on false claims in order to plunder their resources.
LOL, Sad thing is your probably 100% right.Quote:
Originally Posted by Omnis Dei
I'm curious as to why, before leaving for Hawaii on the 23rd Obama signed all pending legislation EXCEPT for the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), which still shows unsigned as of 9:00am (EST) December 26, 2011:
Uh, this is a surprise? Iran shot down one of our planes, which was a huge embarrassment and they will most likely be able to reverse engineer it. It's not an act of war since it was us invading their space, so the only way to start a war and have the support of the blind rednecks is to say they were connected to 9-11, just like Iraq. They also did probably know of Osama Bin Laden's wear-abouts, so even though they didn't help in 9-11, they hid it's culprit. Still going to be a disaster of a war if it comes to that, they are a hell of a lot tougher than Iraq.
And wait, NDAA hasn't been signed yet? Maybe he's thinking about the next election and the negative backlash violating the constitution will have. Finally he does something right.
I see Iran getting a lot of coverage in US news and statements by members of the White House, or the Presidential debates.
It's weird because Iran doesn't even register on our news. I don't recall it being mentioned since the green revolution stuff. Looks like you guys are warming up the war machine; I don't think anybody else will be with you.
Obama promised to veto the NDAA, although I don't think it was over the bill of rights violation.
The worst part about this is the droves of idiots who would gladly go to war over this ruling. I'm sorry, but it's been 10 years and well over 150,000 dead (some estimates put that number many times higher), how much is enough?
:facepalm:Quote:
Originally Posted by Xei
Some US officials suspected Iran of operating secret enrichment and other undeclared nuclear related facilities elsewhere in the country other than those declared in 2003. Who knows if they really are operating nuclear programmes there?Quote:
Originally Posted by Xei
I still find it funny but at the same time disgusting how the US go to war with other countries suspecting them of having armed nuclear weapons when they spend more money than any other country in the world by a large margin on military equipment and they are allowed to build nukes, not only this but being the only nation to ever drop a nuclear weapon on another nation.
Perhaps you have missed out on what they (Iran) have been doing since 1979?Quote:
Originally Posted by lucydity
-Taking over the US Embassy in Tehran and holding hostages for over 444 days.
-Engineering the bombing of Marines in Beruit.
-Funding and arming Hezzbollah, Hamas and God knows who else.
-Their nut job President claiming he will remove Israel from the earth.
I dread the response but what are you talking about?Quote:
Originally Posted by Omnis Dei
BS fabricated by the US. Try to find that quote.Quote:
Originally Posted by ThePieMan
Found this from CNN:Quote:
Originally Posted by Xei
Iranian leader: Wipe out Israel - CNN
Yes, you can read about the issue in full here:
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and Israel - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The idiom 'wiped from the map' doesn't even exist in their language in the first place. The idea that Iran were threatening destruction (implicitly nuclear attacks) is false.
They have weapons of mass destruction, do they? This is all sounding so familiar.
Silly Mark. The enlightened peoples of the post 9/11 world know that 'weapon of mass destruction' can refer to pretty much any object... your car, for instance, could be used as such a weapon. Are you suggesting there weren't any cars in Iraq?
Silly silly silly. Come along now, this is the modern era.
I don't have a car.
Wait, does this mean Iraq wasn't behind the 9/11 attacks?
Eurasia did it, and that's all we ever told you, now clam up.Quote:
Originally Posted by Spartiate
Iran is known to have an ACTUAL nuclear program for some time. It's not known whether or not they actually have create nukes yet (doubtful) but they are only creating them as insurance against US aggression in the region. A superpower illegally invades and imposes it rules on a good number of your neighbours, wouldn't you prepare for war with them? The US military is currently the biggest threat to peace in the middle east, we were the ones who helped heavily arm them in the first place.Quote:
Originally Posted by ♥Mark
i was just reading an article which pointed out that their nut job president never said he was going to wipe israel off the map. Turning Back From the Point of No Return | Foreign Policy Journal do you research and dont parrot shit you see on faux news.Quote:
Originally Posted by ThePieMan
Are you a Christian?
there is no evidence that Iran is creating weaponized nuclear reactors. they want to create nuclear reactors for energy production. these types of reactors are very different and its a simple argument to defeat.Quote:
Originally Posted by ninja9578
israel wants to defend themselves. why dont we let them? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o_ECg...layer_embedded
Pocket veto? If he WOULD have vetoed it... it would have been easily over-ridden by a 2/3rd majority. If they stay out of session until after New Year's Day (since it was sent for signature on the 21st) the Act will not pass. This is exciting news!Quote:
Originally Posted by Ne-yo