After a little chitchat on the mobile, I just want to note something here.
It is true the above statement is completely wrong. With my little knowledge about light and relativity, I did believe the light was actually traveling at a lesser speed relative to other moving objects. It appears, though, my logical failure attributes not so much to encountering a contradiction, but more so to a miscommunication about traveling distance; it isn't that our model of space and time fails, but that I was failing semantically.
Had I understood what exactly constant meant in this regard, I'd have had nothing to argue. And even after I comprehended, I continued to argue because I was failing to communicate about distance, over and over again. Although, at that point it was irrelevant, all along I meant to say that light would be arriving into future space 200M m/s faster than the rocket.
... Is that statement correct?