That article is SUCH an exaggeration. Did Chris Farley play a character who said that stuff on Saturday Night Live?Quote:
Originally Posted by Mystic7
Printable View
That article is SUCH an exaggeration. Did Chris Farley play a character who said that stuff on Saturday Night Live?Quote:
Originally Posted by Mystic7
Now do you have a memory similar to a fish. Or do you remember this......
The lies to get us into war
And you have the thinking capacity of a fish.Quote:
Originally Posted by Mystic7
I find it humorous that whenever his knowledge fails him, he bails out by posting a youtube video. Oh how convincing, a video on YOUTUBE IT MUST BE TRUE!!1
PS I viewed a minute or so of the video and I do not see what relevance Bush's hypocrisy has to him being a "coke-head." You do realize that by avoiding the question, you ARE a hypocrite akin to Bush, right?
You question my memory? Yes, I remember your silly video. You have lots of them that you use when you are stumped. Now it's your turn to take the test. What specifically did I say about the misleading nature of that video the last time I talked to you about it when you used it as a tangent? Come on, memory boy. What did I say?Quote:
Originally Posted by Mystic7
I can definitely see the point in doing that, but it's just so fun to watch him come running at me while barking when as soon as I counter his point he turns around and runs by posting some video or poster. It's just too tempting.Quote:
Originally Posted by M-Cat
Ha ha, nice point. In fact, I would have simply put him on my ignore list a while ago if his posts weren't so funny. I don't know if it's the absurdism, false logic, or non-sequitur arguments, but they ARE pretty hilarious :DQuote:
Originally Posted by Universal Mind
I never avoided any question. I just said he was a cokehead. And this is youQuote:
Originally Posted by M-Cat
Sorry to be off topic, but honestly, how much time do you spend looking for these links to flame people with?Quote:
Originally Posted by Mystic7
Never? Damn, where should I start? I'll start here... What was it you said about why the thousands of people who worked at the Pentagon during the 9/11 "missile" attack on it refrained from revealing the truth about the major tragedy that was the biggest news story of all time because they wanted to keep their jobs at a building their bosses shot with a missile while they were in it?Quote:
Originally Posted by Mystic7
Michael it doesn't take much effort. I'm surprised more people don't use what is available. Universal Mind is starting to copy me with this technique. But he and others try to make fun of it. It doesn't work though. You actually have to do this if you want to stay in the game so to speak. Otherwise no matter what you want to believe. Your putting yourself at a disadvantage on the net if you don't. And one experiences the consequences of that decision.
By copying you, I am making fun of it. Your Youtube posts never directly answer any of the specific questions you are asked. Since that is the game you play, it seems fitting for me to smart off by posting clips from The Wizard of Oz.
Speaking of not answering questions, what is your answer to the Pentagon missile question I just asked you yet again?
Well you mentioned that people at the pentagon would have to say something that a missile hit. But not everyone at the pentagon necessarily would have even known it was a missile. As only the fire fighters or immediate people who would witness the actual impact would have seen it. Which would be very few. plus the people in the know. Considering the security clearances I don't think it's a wild assumption to suggest that such a thing could be supressed from mainstream media considering corporate welfare sponsorship it's almost a given that it would not be investigated. The people that know are not going to get mainstream opportunities on the media to discuss it as it is not in their interest. It is quite easy to see how such a thing could be overlooked. Considering how the system is working.
There are ample resources to point out the mental or moral bankruptcy of the president without resorting to the most controversial, unproven, and inflammatory conspiracy theories that one can think of. As is obvious from the pattern of discussion, doing so makes the denigration appear even more foolish than its subject, and soon everyone is up in arms against each other.
Know your audience, Mystic7. If your ideas are given no consideration, lend yourself some credibility by establishing an agreement with everyone else, then establish your more controversial ideas with information everyone can agree upon.
R.D.735 you may notice I didn't ask for your advice. This is not to make you feel bad but just to let you know that I was answering a question. This means that your out of line. So if you apologize in a genuine way your mistake is forgiven. Otherwise good luck dealing with it at a later time when you finally discover about the effects of that particular conduct. I don't wish to anger you but I needed to defend my position.
I'm genuinely sorry for interrupting you. Please continue.
You don't think a few thousand people would have at least looked out their windows when a missile hit their building? And you did say in another thread that they didn't talk because they wanted to keep their jobs at the building their bosses hit with a missile while they were in it.Quote:
Originally Posted by Mystic7
That's very wise. Though I have basically finished the main point without going into detail. Freedom of the press is absent it's certainly not difficult for a military operation to be carried out in a deceptive fashion over the people. It's false flag terrorism. Not that hard of a concept to understand. It's all part of the war. It's easy to fight someone that doesn't know they are being attacked. Like the old saying keep your enemies close. If the dark side wants to attack it has to convince the light side it is the light. And then create a threat to play things into their hands. That's basic war strategy. Knowing your enemy is half the battle. So was it a missile? Ofcourse it was a missile I know that based on what I researched and my conclusion if speculative at all is by far a reasonable thing to understand.Quote:
Originally Posted by R.D.735
I didn't see a plane hit it. No video of a plane hitting it is existing. And If it is, it should be released. I have seen testimony from one specialist in particular that worked all his life as an aeronautical engineer state that the hole did not fit the airplane when he measured it. I find it strange that the little pieces of wreckage found I have confirmed to be from a different airplane that they claim hit the pentagon. This suggests to me this wreckage was planted at the site. There was no impact in the ground from any collision. I have gone over all this before. But I'll say it again. Not only is the official stories disproved but there is proof of what really happened not just at the pentagon but with the Two towers. And building 7. Combine this with the official Iraq fabrication of evidence. That is now evident and conclusively made up. It is becoming obvious to even those who were before deeply unaware. The nature and position of the actual enemy we are fighting. Is indeed very close to us.
This is ill informed logic. Can you state what kind of people were at the pentagon, their background, character, and what they were doing and how they were doing it? Can you interview them all? Do you know the struture of the workplace and the position of the windows and at what time who looked where during what procedure and who is lieing and who isn't? To me this is a ridiculous case you are making grasping at straws without any attention to more serious evidence.Quote:
Originally Posted by Universal Mind
You can't possibly be in the mind of every single person at the pentagon and simplistically with one broad brush assume that they all knew. And that the smoking gun is because we have not herd them altogether state there was a missile. This is so simple minded to think this way. Do you think after the impact they all turned around in one room together perfectly and through the flames waited to see if they could see any sign of an aircraft? Do you think they are all aligned looking out the window waiting? Or do you think maybe they would rather be evacuated and not die over it.
Realistically when you carry out an attack. You think about it first. So if people at the pentagon were going to be a problem. They would not have even attempted to do this as they would not get away with it. Since the situation was under control. Obviously this leak was effectively and easily contained. But you see it's not that easily contained from people who have intelligence and are interesting in caring about it.
P.S
You don't understand the security system of the pentagon if you think a plane can hit it without deactivation first. It's like the black guy breaking into the queens house. James bond can't get into the queens room. If a missile hits the pentagon. Or if someone gets in the queens room. IT WAS ORDERED IN LIKE PIZZA.
When a missile hits a building, especially the United States government's Department of Defense building, people look to see what the Hell it was. They don't just go, "Huh, that was loud. Where was I on that document?" Even if just three people looked to see what it was, which would be insane, word that it was a missile would have been everywhere. But this still is off the topic of how you said people at the Pentagon knew it was a missile attack and wanted to keep their jobs any way and therefore did not rat on their bosses. Remember?
The word is everywhere. Everywhere that matters. Not the media. You may notice it only hit a certain part of the pentagon not the entire pentagon. It's not like everyone is their watching waiting for the missile so they can go on television to explain everything for us. Those that are allowing it, won't be waiting to announce it. Those that suspect. Aren't always willing to get fired. Some are and they do get fired.Quote:
Originally Posted by Universal Mind
You are very insistent on this literal idea of seeing the plane. But you can't say personally that anyone saw it. You have this false idea about how things can't be suppressed. Ufo's are suppressed even since 1947 when one crashed in front of everyone. Yet you think oh the word would be out entirely. But UFOs are over the entire globe man, think. It's easy to distort peoples prejudice. Thousands of witnesses and many years research and Ufos still aren't confirmed? Pictures video and physical evidence. Same as what I got to prove the missile. And you think that one military operation of the pentagon cannot be distorted in the department of defenses favor? Some are still stupid enough to think UFOs don't exist. Yet are they logical? I don't hear you asking why all the witnesses of UFOs didn't cause a big announcement. So a few people from the pentagon are suppose to break the dam of secrecy about a petty missile impact. That is the most silly thing since it's the centre of security where things are officially or not officially confirmed.
People want to keep their job yes, If they know about UFOs. If they seen them. They can't go shouting in front of the nation I saw a UfO and I work at the pentagon. Then they resign and look stupid don't they. Why are you so simple minded? No-one goes to work at the pentagon and then realizes oh it can be attacked by my boss I'm out of here i didn't realize crazy people worked here. That's not how it works. That's a very simple world that you might have thought existed from television. Compartmentalization in the military and society results in one person not knowing what the other knows that is working right beside them.
Do you have any idea how gossipy people are, especially about humongous news? I know a lot of people who work in Washington, and I have not heard a peep about a missile attack by the U.S. Department of Defense on its own Department of Defense building. I think I might have heard a little something if it had happened. I think the whole world would have, and the world would continue to. The government would not roll that kind of dice any way.
Yet, I hear about UFO sightings all the time.
Have you not herd a peep about the Gulf of Tonkin inncident. Or the set up for the invasion of Poland by hitler. Have you not herd a peep about official cia government documents describing the plan for a peal harbor attack on America. Have you not herd a peep about what propaganda is. Do you have testimony people saw the plane in the pentagon. Do you think they are too talkative for it. What about climate change fraud. Are they all too talkative to tell us that it's not man made aswel....
Your in over your head. You don't know what's going on.
There is a difference between a few government officials working with some members of the military in secrecy and thousands of regular Joes who work at the Pentagon. Not everybody at the Pentagon is some high level government drone who worships at a George Bush shrine. Tons of them are regular people who just need to make a living. The Pentagon employs janitors, computer programmers, secretaries, truck drivers, data collectors, division supervisors, window washers, researchers, cafeteria cooks and food servers, and all kinds of other every day civilian workers. Most of them are not on the pedestal you put them on. Most of them are far from being men in black types who go to and from work in black helicopters that turn invisible and communicate with UFO's. They are just regular people who need to pay their bills and would be horrified by the thought of taking part in some outrageous conspiracy.