Dude america is not the world police. You cant just go and invade any country you want because the government is totalarian.
Your activity was not legitimate. Iraq did nothing to the united states. They never attacked you guys they were all isolated. You guys invaded them when they had nothing to do with you at all.
The rioters are responding to an illegitimate invasion on your behalf, you invaded when iraq had nothing to do with you guys and then you take control of the country by force. The "rioters" will not stop till you are gone, you are the original agressors not them,your prescence is illegitmate.
The americans ie the burgalars started the fight now the occupatants of the house are fighting to get rid of the bugalars. Why do you think the insurgency even took up arms? cause you guys invaded the country, they wont stop till you're out and your illegal occupation. Like i said you are not the world police.
You should have only invaded with the blessing of NATO and the UN like was the case with Aghanistan. You were impatient to invade and you invaded but the proper procedure would have been to get permession would be to get a proper security clearance from the UN and NATO the decesion wether or not to invade. You guys waited and got clearance to invade Afghanistan with NATO and the UN so why couldnt you wait for the UN? They should of been the ones to decide wether or not war woudl be a choice not a country whos presdent once said Iraq was connected to 9/11 to make up a reason to invade.
Like i said there is a reason why the UN is there, its to make sure countries liek the USA dont make do imperalist things like invading countries that have nothing to do with them. Wether or not to invade Iraq should have been a decision by the UN and NATO not by a sole country.
I will make a specific post to the "bin ladesn leader to america" so dont worry that part will be adressed.
If there was sufficient reason for the invasion of Iraq then the UN security council would have responded appropiately but the decision to invade didn't lye with an invidual country. The UN charter does give nations the right to self defense....Quote:
That is what Ritter said. He was in major disagreement with a lot of people, such as other U.N. representatives, leaders of intelligence divisions in five other countries, people in our CIA, people in our Senate (including Democrats), and our former presidential administration (Clinton). What they were claiming was far too serious to not act on it, and that was only one reason for the invasion of Iraq.
"under the UN charter, which guarantees the right of each state to self-defence, including pre-emptive self-defence"
Under this the USA would have had reason to invade or attack iraq but the problem is Iraq was not an imminent threat to the USA.
Even a washington insider who worked with rumsefeld amitted it to the illegality of the war.
"International lawyers and anti-war campaigners reacted with astonishment yesterday after the influential Pentagon hawk Richard Perle conceded that the invasion of Iraq had been illegal.
In a startling break with the official White House and Downing Street lines, Mr Perle told an audience in London: "I think in this case international law stood in the way of doing the right thing"
The apporpiate thing to do would be to wait for NATO and the UN to take action and the the UN resoloution warning Iraq that their would be serious consequences if it did not comply with onother resoloution was not for the US to back up it was for the UN security Council to choose what measures or consequences would be appropiate to take in response to any iraqi non compliance.