A pinky toe is required to stand up, and nothing about a pinky toe makes it harder to clean the foot.
And there's no statistical data that says sexual pleasure goes "way down" when you get circumsized.
Printable View
A pinky toe is required to stand up, and nothing about a pinky toe makes it harder to clean the foot.
And there's no statistical data that says sexual pleasure goes "way down" when you get circumsized.
No, a pinky toe isn't required to stand up. You can still stand up without a pinky toe, and walk, in the same way you can still have sex after circumcision. The foreskin aids sexual pleasure. The pinky toe aids balance. The aid from foreskin to sexual pleasure, however, is greater than the aid to balance a pinky toe offers. Having a pinky toe does indeed cause many types of problems because people wear shoes, I said nothing about cleaning the foot, I purposely gave you the correct parallel, not the faulty one you are presenting of "cleaning the foot." You can at least learn to walk the same without a pinky toe, you can't learn to feel more pleasure without foreskin.Quote:
Originally Posted by Omnius Deus
Why are you quoting "way down"?
It is pretty hard to do statistics on something most people have done when they are infants, so they can't compare.
They can't really do a study on adults and say anything because the age at which it was done could affect it. But there was a study done http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/69318.php which suggests that circumcision in adults does indeed decrease pleasure, in almost half of the cases.
I quoted that becazuse I'm an up and coming journalist practicing to be on fox news by misrepresenting your ideas and flat out making things up.
Anyways, you're spinning this all in inaccurate ways. The pinky is much more beneficial to th leg than you realize, and that article did not point out in dramatic changes in pleasure.
The penis gets desensitized more, but so does playing with it in general so that's not something you can avoid.
I like my foreskin. It keeps the head moist. I can't see why someone would chop off part of their dick so it would be easier to clean.
Lol. Mine is funny to play with-----
Uhm....
:)
Yah, I don't see why, Mine never really gets dirty ¬_¬
Infection and foul odors could easily well up in the foreskin. You should have gotten that part of your dick chopped off. Makes the sex better anyway.Quote:
Originally Posted by stonedape
Circumcised people = WIN
Uncircumcised people = odorous, unclean FAIL
:chuckle:
hurp durpQuote:
Originally Posted by guitarboy
Circumsized people have less sexual satisfaction than uncircumcized people. Sadly their sexual drive doesn't go down though.
And quite a few of these people with foreskin have said it gives them no cleaning problems...
Why would it???Quote:
Originally Posted by Sandform
Why people make such an issue of it is beyond me.
If you say you're circumsized in Europe people will immediately think you are a Jew. Because no one does it, and no one ever complains about anything. Being uncircumsized has never given me any problems.
(Note: why is the thread title "white privilege"? What does that have to do with the thread? :))
this conversation just went to ill!! :eek:
.Quote:
Originally Posted by Timothy Paradox
I enjoy sexual activity just fine without my foreskin.
Foreskin=more sense in penis.
More sense in penis=easier climax.
Easier climax=sexual sessions that are not quite so prolonged.
sexual sessions that are not quite so prolonged=less sexual pleasure for female
Less sexual pleasure for female=female not as satisfied as she'd be with circumcised man.
And we all know where that'll lead. I don't know if what I've stated above is true or not, but it is certainly something to consider.
back to topic. I think it's unfair that white people seem to have more of a priveledge. It's just culture and it will change with time.
but what i find even more stupid is this guy.
I think you've posted this video before. That guy is an idiot and everyone that clapped are idiots too. He's just a black version of the KKK. Seriously, it's people like that that make me want to arrange fist to cheekbone meetings.Quote:
Originally Posted by ranma187
Amen. Although in this case I think bullet to heart would be more appropriate.Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeff777
i do not believe i have posted that before.Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeff777
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeff777
I don't know how many times it has been posted, but you would have saw it from Serkat at least once since you were involved in that thread at one time.Quote:
Originally Posted by Serkat
If white people wanted black people dead, we would have done it by now. We have all the power right? We would collaborate with the jews for funding.