Originally Posted by
Marvo
If you strain your braincells a little bit, you will see that my post was a criticism of exactly that method of argumentation. Pakman presented no proof, he simply said that he was "pretty sure sciences supports the theory that the body can produce this energy.", the energy in question being some magical unseen force. I would absolutely LOVE to see a paper on this energy, and if science supports it, then there certainly will be a paper.
If your arguments are not going to go beyond "I've seen/read/heard/felt some shit", then I don't see why my criticism or skepticism should go beyond "No you haven't".