https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/1865
Do it.
Printable View
I'd rather stick with Opera and it's built-in features.
I did so months ago, it has proved valuable.
Remember to check the filter on EasyList
I think most people installed this when asher added ads a while ago.
You're probably right, but I think it's good enough to have a thread.
I downloaded it, and took out some ads on my favorite sites. I had this before, but had forgotten to add it when my computer got restored. Thanks.
The wiki of one of my favorite browser games, (Kingdom of Loathing,) didn't check their ads closely enough for malware one time. Users were attacked by a popup ad that implanted a virus into their system when interacted with. Half of those on the forum had Adblock Plus installed, so nobody with it got the malicious ad.
Using the internet is like having sex with a hobo. You never know what it could give you, so it's best to stay safe.
This is similar to Gizmodo
http://gizmodo.com/5390520/apologies...ads-on-gizmodo
None of the staff noticed, as none of them ran windows
No, the internet is fine
it's the system installed on your machine that's wrong
http://googleads.g.doubleclick.net/p...MggnQodvdCZW6g
There are ads? I can't see any ads... Where are they located?
http://img18.imageshack.us/img18/7747/adsy.png
This. Program. Is. Win. Thank you, Mark. :)
Then....how do the ads that sites put on pay off if so many people have this installed? Or is it a small amount of the population that has things like this installed, so it doesn't matter?
Same reason why spam is profitable
There's no financial outlay to the site operator
It costs £0 to display an ad
There's no cost of printing, or anything like what's involved with printed adverts. The bandwidth costs to display an ad born by the ad operator (google, or whoever)
Consequently, it costs £0 to display 50 ads or 100 ads
Even if only one in a thousand visitors clicks on an ad, it's all profit
With no overheads, the worst you can do is not make any money