Duh... I later realized that:
2 pairs of socks + 2 pairs of underwear = 6 articles of clothing
Printable View
Duh... I later realized that:
2 pairs of socks + 2 pairs of underwear = 6 articles of clothing
Let's vote on whom has the best answer :D
Damn , someones already done something similar to this , but ill put it up anyway .
Okay , heres my attempt .
I have created my own numbering system , its of a base 9 , or there are nine numbers that make up the system before it goes into double digits .
The numbering system is this -
1 , 2 , 3 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 0 .
Okay , so using my unique numbering system i call Nofours , i will prove to you that 2+2=5
I will use a number line to explain how
I was here
V
0 1 2 3 5
|----|----|----|----|
Then i added 2 more to my position. Which brings me to here -
V
0 1 2 3 5
|----|----|----|----|
So there you go , 2+2=5 using the unique Nofours numbering system . :mrgreen:
Cool, so 2+2 can equal 5. The next time my maths teachers says i've got a question wrong i shove that up their ass! :mrgreen:Quote:
Originally posted by Darkmatic
I have created my own numbering system , its of a base 9 , or there are nine numbers that make up the system before it goes into double digits . *
The numbering system is this -
1 , 2 , 3 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 0 .
Okay , so using my unique numbering system i call Nofours , i will prove to you that 2+2=5
I will use a number line to explain how *
I was here
* * * * * *V
0 * *1 * 2 * *3 * *5
|----|----|----|----|
Then i added 2 more to my position. Which brings me to here -
* * * * * * * * * * * * V
0 * *1 * 2 * *3 * *5
|----|----|----|----|
So there you go , 2+2=5 using the unique Nofours numbering system . :mrgreen:
It is implied that 2 + 2 = 5 is in the base 10 (it's 10 right?) number system :P
Aha , implied but not specifically said , and thats how you lose a case by not stating something . :-PQuote:
Originally posted by ataraxis
It is implied that 2 + 2 = 5 is in the base 10 (it's 10 right?) number system :P
Dude, that's idiotic. It's like... going up to someone and when they say something in english being like "I don't understand you... your japanese is very poor!".
Well , you did not state the rules of the game , therefore i assumed it was open slather , you see where im coming from ? The whole purpose of the game is to think outside the square , and surely that includes the numbering system as a whole .Quote:
Originally posted by ataraxis
Dude, that's idiotic. *It's like... going up to someone and when they say something in english being like "I don't understand you... your japanese is very poor!".
My opinion: what you did was perfectly legal, and a very good explanation ;)
Lol yeah, I just wanted to make dudesuperior wouldn't sound like an effing idiot if he said that to his teacher :P
This isn't school. Anyway, anyone else want a bash at it?
I love you placebo! :smitten:Quote:
Originally posted by Placebo
This isn't school. Anyway, anyone else want a bash at it?
2 + 2 = 5
where 5 is a variable that equals 4
That's deep. I have one...Quote:
Originally posted by OpheliaBlue
2 + 2 = 5
where 5 is a variable that equals 4
2 + 2 = 5
Where 2 is a variable that equals 2.5
omg that was TWICE as deep :o
You can do better than that, surely? :P
lol.
alright FINE:Quote:
Originally posted by Placebo
You can do better than that, surely? :P
lol.
http://img99.imageshack.us/img99/1056/2and2is54es.jpg
Awesome!Quote:
Originally posted by OpheliaBlueMe
alright FINE:
http://img99.imageshack.us/img99/1056/2and2is54es.jpg
2 is a mataphore for the seperation between god and man. God doens't exist so 2 is 1. However free-will exist in relative context so the pair of one's decide to merge sexually into a 5.
^__^