Frankly,
The idea of simutaneously existing in many elsewheres is becoming quite mainstream. So the definition, the protocol, etc. relating to the idea of ascension could be strictly subjective.
Printable View
Frankly,
The idea of simutaneously existing in many elsewheres is becoming quite mainstream. So the definition, the protocol, etc. relating to the idea of ascension could be strictly subjective.
To Leo,
This is something I wrote on the philosophy boards as well, under the greatest persons thread, page 7.Quote:
On good and evil.
Simply put, my good is evil for someone else, and someone elses good is my evil.
Frame of reference.[/b]
Hahaha.
I consider myself of no specific theological denomination, not to say either dharma or taoism is anything more than a philosophy, just that I abide to no crede.
And on wrong and right, I'd rather be left. ;-P
To km,
The goal of ascension, or quantum existance perhaps even would be more an objective thing if you were to ask me, but perhaps the path there could be subjective, though I cannot quite grasp how that would be, for it would be to deny every person on a whole the feeling of being a part of the plemora, something I think most any on the path would have come by at one point or another.
Depends on which higher plane this is. I'd have to know all of the details about both the higher being and the higher plane to make a truly valid decision. I'd also want to earn the position instead of being handed it on a platter.
If I am a sinner, then whatever....I really don't care, as long as I don't get banned from here/Crescent View/Temple. Let me sleep on it!Quote:
Originally posted by Leo Volont
But once these souls are arrived at this Higher Plane, all the problems they once had with the Red Sins -- all those sins of compulsion and passion, are effectively transcended.
So, if you are not a Republican or a Capitalist (who more than proudly fly the Flag of the Black Sins), then you might certainly not have any problem at all with moving up to a Higher Plane.
Uh, as to hunger, usually if I am occupied, I won't eat. In XP5, why should I eat anyways if I cannot eat anything in someone else's dream anyways? I am far more interested in exploring, or playing around with Cody (don't get the wrong ideas...we just talk and goof off there, since we are friends, and very silly), and usually, am very overwhelmed by relaxation, and not really worried by any of that (the only time in my life I ever am not worrying :lol: ). Or....5PX is much more relaxing than that, if I feel like going there (well, time there is quite speedy).
So, if the higher planes are higher than 5PX and XP5 which are supposedly Dream Planes higher than LD planes, which are higher than airplanes which are higher than our plane.....that must mean that they are a lot nicer than XP5, which is nice as it is! Right Leo? Kind of confusing, isn't it? :D