I would expect it to remain, yeah. "I" am just a product of the matter that constitutes me.
It would still be "me". "I" wouldn't notice any change at all. Which only shows that "I" don't really exist, I'm just a product of the matter that constitutes me. The human brain is but a machine.
Where would my awareness be? Hmm... Your question is misleading. One's awareness is not located somewhere specific. It's similar to your desires. Where are your desires located? They are located nowhere, they are produced by your brain. Add an exact copy of your brain and you'd have an exact copy of your desires. Same is for your awareness/attention.
You surely don't. Thing is, you think you know more than you actually do. You're barely at 20% and you think you're at 70%.
Hmmm, two things....
1) What the camera has isn't attention. It's just a machine working. What I mean by attention is attention in the neurological/physiological/cognitive sense. You probably know this, but you came up with this shit of an argument anyway because you had no other.
2) You're mistaking consciousness with self-consciousness.
In simple terms, self-consciousness is the ability to direct one's attention to things that happen internally. The degree that the attention can go into one's functioning determines how self-conscious the being is. A dog gets angry and that's it. A man gets angry and notices it, having the potential to intervene in his anger. Thus, the man is more self-conscious than the dog when it comes to anger.
The thing about attention and self-consciousness is that humans use their attention (a cognitive process) in order to obtain feedback on the brain's own functioning. It's much like a feedback system within the brain itself. Attention is the sensor that reads information, and based on a multitude of other variables, acts.
Consciousness on the other hand, means knowledge or acknowledgement. A man can be conscious of his potential, of his social class, of his problems... etc etc etc. It's a much more macroscopic and humanistic concept.