Quote:
Well that’s obvious, but these are not the limitations I’m speaking of. I’m speaking of limitations by paradigm. Logic and reasoning “In-and-of-itself” cannot reveal deeper truths of existence. It can conceptualize it in abstract, but that is not truth itself. I want you to tell me why. How can logic not reveal the truth itself? Again, excuse me if I sound pretentious, but I think this leads to a critical understanding.
I'll leave this for our other forum.
Quote:
Now, to address the topic of astral domains, which are connected to my point of limitations of logical reasoning (above paragraph). Not the parameters of logic, but the intrinsic limitations, which are indirect to logic’s purpose. Often logic is exercised to be very superficial and categorical – but this pertains only to certain contexts of reality. In other contexts, such as spiritual domains, logic ultimately doesn’t mean anything. That does not subsequently mean that spirituality is fallacious, but rather, that it is transcendental to an intellectual understanding. I can’t stress this enough, and I know it’s very difficult to grasp.
That’s not flawed reasoning. Sounds like semantics to me.
Have you heard of “concepts”; reasoning through utility and representation? :P How does a traveler realize that the map is not the territory?
Seems to me like you’re going off on a tangent. Don’t mix up our debates; what I’m talking about in this thread/topic has little to do with God. I’d also appreciate if you kept your opinions to yourself, especially this “venomfangx” nonsense. Mature debate, ok?
No not at all. But I do know that the understandings are uncommon and overlooked by the vast majority of mankind.
I am beginning to think now that you just have a severe problem admitting that you are wrong or even could be wrong. Everything you say stinks with unfalsifiable arguments and you reinforce that. I cannot debate with you on anything really other than this point.