Standardization of Human Psychology

[Philosopher8659]

Most people find it not only difficult, but infuriating as to what I am about. To put it simply, the mind has one and only one definition. There is to be developed then the elucidation of a standard foundation for human psychology. It has historic roots in the Judeo-Christian Scripture, the works of Plato, and believe it or not, scattered in the works of Aristotle, Euclid, and relies a great deal on the foundation of language--the Two-Element Metaphysics, etc., Civilization has been effected through standards in language, beliefs, commerce, it extrapolates to a standard in human psychology. People will admit the benifits of standards in the creation and maintenance of civilization, but many claim these standards are destructive, which is like saying that a craftsman does not make beautiful things but quite the contrary. Needless to say, a great deal more mental work is entailed than people are use to. Just looking for a lady friend to work on it with. Wrote up a figure that multiplies and divides a line by a line in Euclidean Geometry. Never heard of nor can find any commensurate figure on the Internet, but it seems to me that one should be able to understand all the basic math moves with a geometric figure, in fact, a small book on it would have been nice. Proofing the figure with MathCad was very easy. Decided to package it with Language and Experiencem, ebook and audiobook for the Internet Archive. Got a wifi link yesterday, if it holds out I will post the package. The importance of a work demonstrating all the basic math moves in Euclidean Geometry is this, it demonstrates Euclidean Geometry closed to the operations of math therefore effectively, by the very standards of mathematicians, removes any mathematical justification for non-Euclidean Mathematics. This is their words, but adding Language and Experience will also put in how non-Euclidean Geometry is invalid from the very metaphysics of a language itself. The reason this whole affair is fundamentally important, goes to the very foundation of judgment itself, all one can do is assert or deny, when one fails to see that they said they are the same (Law of the Excluded Middle, etc) it is as Aristotle said, they can think no better than a veggy, no matter how clever their presentation is. It is the foundation of psychology. At any rate the demise of non-Euclidean Geometry is also the demise of Einstein's Relativity. Two birds with one stone. Shades of David and Goliath.

[Philosopher8659]

Been rethinking about Geometry. Maybe a small book on geometry emphasizing algebra. Dug up some work I started earlier on it. If I remember, did pdf abstracts of several works about graphic arithmetic. Need to get something small and complete--emphasis on the methaphysics and how it relates to product. Did more research trying to find multiplication and division of a line by line. I was right--it does not exist. Seems I am the first. Very strange indeed.

[Medevila]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PMTIVUQKpzA

[EspadaInMyCloset]

"Needless to say, a great deal more mental work is entailed than people are use to." Ouch. Dat hurt. "The reason this whole affair is fundamentally important, goes to the very foundation of judgment itself, all one can do is assert or deny, when one fails to see that they said they are the same (Law of the Excluded Middle, etc) it is as Aristotle said, they can think no better than a veggy, no matter how clever their presentation is." So basically, we're just going to keep arguing with ourselves and others for the rest of damned humanity over just about everything with inevitable contradiction (and corruption in politicical shit and stuff). That's just dandy, really. The world is ever more flawed. "Did more research trying to find multiplication and division of a line by line. I was right--it does not exist. Seems I am the first. Very strange indeed." You lost me. I'm retaking algebra, don't be surprised.

[Philosopher8659]

Actually, the human mind is evolving to perform a function like every other environmental acquisition system of a living organism. We, as mind, are simply not yet functional. Language rests upon a standard foundation in human will, thus a standard foundation in human psychology. Language and Experience : John J. Clark : Free Download & Streaming : Internet Archive As far as how I do geometry, see The Delian Quest and Multiplication and Division posts on the archive. Internet Archive Search: johnclark8659 Many sources credit Descartes, through the co-ordinate system, of discovering how to use algebra with geometry. It is simply not true--the coordinate method of approach actually keeps one from doing any real geometry at all. Graphing and Geometry are not the same. The problem is, in order to parallel the two languages, one has to understand the grammar. One will notice that I write the equations to the figures without any trace of either Descarts or Trig. I use Sketchpad and MathCad--two live document programs.