Originally Posted by ninja9578
Your knowledge of the evolution of martial arts is a little flawed. When Korea gained it's independence they wanted their own martial arts system independent and disjoint from the Japanese Karate. The top masters in the country got together and formalized their methods. This was Chung Do Kwan Tae Kwon Do. This was a real martial art, a combination of philosophy and working techniques. From several other styles branched out, including olympic style TKD, which is what most people take today. The other was Tang Soo Do. Soo Bahk Do is a direct derivative of Tang Soo Do. Grandmaster Hyang Kee was an expert in Tang Soo Do before he split to create Soo Bahnk Do. If you move back and forth between a TSD and SBK class, there are very few differences.
I meant that it is too bounded by it's philosophy, not that philosophy is bad. Karate teaches philosophy of being a scholar as well, it's when the tradition interferes with training it's bad. Instructors are forbidden to spar their students in SBD, I mean what the hell is that? I see absolutely no reason for that. Moral codes and ethics are good, but I believe that they should come from inside and not be tied together with martial arts. The only moral that I ever tell any of my students is if you don't absolutely have to fight then don't and if you do, win.
You mean "Tang Soo Do" by grandmaster Hwang Kee? I've read it.
Rank doesn't mean anything in any martial art. It was just to make it easier on teachers to group students by what they had been taught so it is easier to teach them.
Ok, I did some searching and agree, the original Tae Kwon Do was a martial art. Nowadays though, it is a sport. When Korea was liberated, Hwang Kee was working on making his own martial art. Combining his knowledge of Chinese and Korean arts, he made Hwa Soo Do Moo Duk Kwan. People didn't quite understand what he was teaching, and so changed the name to Tang Soo Do Moo Duk Kwan so people would register that he was teaching martial arts. Later on, he found an ancient text called the Moo Yei Dobo Tong Ji, which was basically a self defense manual of Ancient Korea. In it, the term "Soo Bahk" was used often, and so he changed the name once more to Soo Bahk Do Moo Duk Kwan to embrace the history of Korea's early defense techniques. Hence why there are few differences. Tradition does not hinder training, it makes the training unique to the art. And what's this talk of the instructor not being able to spar their students? My instructor's sparred me plenty of times, even grappled. I lost every time, but I still sparred him. The best battle was the one not fought, I agree, but what is winning if you die, hmm? Winning never means surviving. Though that book does say Tang Soo Do, it also says Soo Bahk Do in nice big letters, to let you know it used to be Tang Soo Do, and is now Soo Bahk Do.
|
|
Bookmarks