probably the easiest way to up the quality in general is to record at higher sample rates |
|
I write and record all of my own music. Every instrument, and I record it all in my basement. No help whatsoever. It's recently dawned on me that the sound quality of some of my music could be a lot better than it is. I want to know if anyone knows how to get a better mix using EQ and compression, and which types of EQ (graphic, visual, parametric) and which types of compression (like multiband compression) to use. |
|
My music - www.soundcloud.com/jaredemmanuel
probably the easiest way to up the quality in general is to record at higher sample rates |
|
(\_ _/)
(='.'=)
(")_(")
That's something that never even crossed my mind.. but sadly I'm not sure how to do that in G band.. maybe I do need to use a better sequencer. |
|
My music - www.soundcloud.com/jaredemmanuel
you need a much better sequencer than g-band. |
|
e-x--p---a----n-----d------> yourself.
I'm slowly getting there... that sucks about garage band. A producer who goes by "Tweak" has a site called tweakheadz.com where he reviewed garageband and said it was good as long as it was ultimately bounced or imported into logic for mixing touchups and to begin mastering. |
|
My music - www.soundcloud.com/jaredemmanuel
parametric is what you do after regular eqing....it's like for fine tuning frequencies inside a certain sound. like you can boost frequencies around 1khz or you can boost low frequencies while inserting a filter....and I think visual eq is just something like cool edit or sound forge....i could be wrong |
|
Bookmarks