I can tell no real difference in the vividness of either. The only difference that I've found is just the fact that they induce the LD differently. After you are in the LD, things are the same. |
|
For those of you who have had both WILD'S and DILD'S, which in your opinions would you say is the more vivid and clear one, and the one that tends to last longer? What are the ups and downs of each method? etc |
|
I can tell no real difference in the vividness of either. The only difference that I've found is just the fact that they induce the LD differently. After you are in the LD, things are the same. |
|
you must be the change you wish to see in the world...
-gandhi
|
|
[quote]From my experiance wether I became lucid via DILD or WILD they were the same. Not meaning the level of lucidity could not very in both. But rather that when I became lucid it felt as all lucid dreams do. |
|
When you fall asleep your conscious mind goes asleep as well. Unless envoked otherwise, correct? |
|
My WILDs have been much more vivid, and I've had two that felt like they were about 4 hours long when I took a 20 minute nap. |
|
|
|
Is there a thread anywhere on these forums that explains your method? I'd really like to try it out |
|
|
|
Thought: maybe DILDs have a chance of being shorter seeing as how they're induced mid-dream (sometimes), and therefore mid REM period. Usually WILDs are induced when you have an optimal situation for them, i.e. when REM periods are the longest. |
|
|
|
Bookmarks