Ok..I came across this article in the Orlando Sentinel that completely grabbed my attention. While I don't ascribe to any set religion, my curiousity and open-mind leaves me very receptive to the fact that there could be other powers at work that science simply cannot explain. The main objection I hear from scientists and their followers is that no 'Controlled" experiments are ever taken to try to prove or disprove paranormal phenomena. This will be one such experiment that I can't wait to see the outcome on:
Healing that Goes Beyond Pills and Procedures
By Hilary MacGregor | Los Angeles Times
Posted May 8, 2005
SAN FRANCISCO -- On an operating table at a medical center in San Francisco, a breast-cancer patient is undergoing reconstructive surgery after a mastectomy. But this will be no ordinary surgery. Three thousand miles away, a shamanic healer has been sent the woman's name, a photo and details about the surgery.
For each of the next eight days, the healer will pray 20 minutes for the cancer patient's recovery, without the woman's knowledge. A surgeon has inserted two small fabric tubes into the woman's groin to enable researchers to measure how fast she heals.
The woman is a patient in an extraordinary government-funded study to determine whether prayer has the power to heal patients from afar -- a field known as "distant healing."
In recent years, medicine has increasingly shown an interest in investigating the effect of prayer and spirituality on health. A survey of 31,000 adults released last year by the national Centers for Disease Control and Prevention found that 43 percent of U.S. adults prayed for their own health, while 24 percent had others pray for their health.
Some researchers say that is reason enough to study the power of prayer.
"Almost every community in the world has a prayer for the sick, which they practice when a member of their community is ill," says Dr. Mitchell Krucoff, a Duke University cardiologist and researcher in the field of distant prayer and healing.
Science has only begun to explore the power of distant healing, and the early results of this research have been inconclusive. In an article published in the Annals of Internal Medicine in 2000, researchers reported on 23 studies on distant-healing techniques, including religious, energy and spiritual healing. Thirteen of the 23 studies indicated positive effects to distant healing, nine studies found no beneficial effect and one study showed a modest negative effect.
Although some scientists oppose such studies on religious or scientific grounds, others question whether it is possible to devise a scientifically valid method for measuring something as nebulous as the power of prayer.
"There are enormous methodological and conceptual problems with the studies of distant prayer," says Dr. Richard Sloan, a professor of behavioral medicine at Columbia University in New York. "Nothing in our understanding of our universe or ourselves suggests how the thoughts of one group of people could influence the physiology of people 3,000 miles away."
Power of prayer?
Cardiologist Randolph Byrd did the first major clinical study on distant healing at San Francisco General Hospital in 1988. He divided 393 heart patients into two groups.
One group received prayers from Christians outside the hospital; the other did not. His study, published in the Southern Medical Journal, found that the patients who were not prayed for needed more medication and were more likely to suffer complications. Although it had flaws, the study garnered considerable attention.
Since then, investigators have continued to look at the possible effects of remote prayer and similar distant-healing techniques in the treatment of heart disease, AIDS and other illnesses, as well as infertility.
"Critics often complain that if you see positive results in humans it is because of positive thinking, or the placebo response," says Dr. Larry Dossey, a retired internist in Santa Fe, N.M., and author of numerous books on spirituality and healing. "Microbes don't think positively and are not subject to the placebo response."
In the early '90s, Elisabeth Targ and colleagues at the California Pacific Medical Center studied the effects of distant healing on 20 AIDS patients.
The study found that those receiving prayer survived in greater numbers, got sick less often and recovered faster than those who did not, says Marilyn Schlitz, a senior scientist at California Pacific Medical Center. Schlitz worked with Targ, who died of a brain tumor in 2002. A follow-up study of 40 patients found similar results.
At about the same time, Duke University's Krucoff was leading a small but unusual experiment to determine if cardiac patients would recover faster after angioplasty surgery if they received any of several intangible treatments. His study compared the results of healing touch, stress relaxation and distant healing with standard care.
Spiritual healers from around the world -- including Jews leaving prayers at the Western Wall in Jerusalem, Buddhists praying in monasteries in Nepal and France, Carmelite nuns in Baltimore offering prayers during vespers, and Moravians, Baptists and fundamental Christians praying during church -- each simultaneously prayed for one of several designated groups in the study.
All of the groups did better than the standard care group, with those receiving distant prayers doing best. He has since completed a larger, multisite study. That study -- the largest to date -- is under review for publication in a medical journal.
One of the leading centers for such research is the Institute of Noetic Sciences, where Schlitz is vice president of research and education.
A study by the institute and California Pacific Medical Center, which will be completed next year, will follow 140 breast-cancer patients who have undergone reconstructive surgery. At the time of the surgery, each patient has two small, spaghettilike tubes of Gore-Tex implanted in her groin to measure how much collagen is deposited as her wound heals.
The study is designed to address one of the primary concerns raised by critics of distant-healing research: that the studies are not designed to account for a placebo effect.
Researchers have divided the patients into three groups. One group will be prayed for but will not know of the prayers; another will be prayed for and will be told of the prayers; and a third group will receive no prayers and will be told nothing. The healers who will do the praying must have years of experience in distant healing and come from varied traditions -- such as shamanism, bioenergy and reiki.
After eight days, the tubes will be removed and collagen growth in the wound area will be analyzed -- an accepted scientific method to measure wound healing. The rates of healing will then be compared.
Mary Destri, 43, a reiki healer who is participating in the study, had misgivings about the study design. She says she had participated as a healer in other scientific experiments but had typically been given more information about the patient.
"This is the first time I've ever worked on someone I've never met, the first time I'm working with someone I have no access to, cannot communicate with," she says. "It helps with intentionality to have a sharper focus."
As a cardiologist, Krucoff has seen many patients near death. He says that what determines their survival often reaches beyond technology and medicine.
"We are pretty good at doing studies on the safety and effectiveness of pills and procedures," says Krucoff. "We have a well-established approach to figure out what the risks and benefits are likely to be. . . . Could you inadvertently kill someone with a loving prayer? Not too many theologians want to have that discussion. But in health care, these are fundamental questions."
|
|
Bookmarks