The Psineticism Philosophy

[cd27]

The Psineticism Philosophy Okay guys, i've been studying alot in philosophy in american lit class and all, so i am prepared (hmm..prepared...Pared before.coudlt aht be what that means? lol..i know what it means...so um...don't answer that question..lol) to Make my own NEW philosophy of the universe and i hope it gets BIG points. here it is: i call it PSINETICISM of course, this is named after my theory (which is called the Psinetic Theory of Psionics). so why did i call my theory that? well, if you split it up you will see two seperate parts to it: PSI and NET Psi is represented as the energy of the universe, and Net represents how i proclaim the works of that energy being EVERYWHERE. thus hte word PSINETIC. what do i call the study of my theory? PSINETICS. what does PSINETICISM mean? PSINETICISM-the belief that natural laws do not apply nor do they exist; the belief that natural laws are actually natural manipulants (being able to be manipulated to one's will) and that nature is an illusionistic mental prison that gives the false illusion that things are impossible; the belief that the supernatural is not only normal, but that the normal can also be clasified as supernatural. i am a PSINETICON (one who believes and lives PSINETICISM). so what do you guys think? cd

[Preacher]

Thought I can't place it, it sounds familiar to other philoshopical theories i've read.....From Plato to Neo...........

[Cyclic13]

I think you should read the warning labels on your prescriptions, before you type...

[cd27]

Originally posted by SolSkye I think you should read the warning labels on your prescriptions, before you type... i sure hope you aren't breaking any of these: IMPORTANT THINGS TO REMEMBER WHEN POSTING: * 1) An attack on your ideas is not necessarily an attack on you. This is IMPORTANT; I'm guilty myself of taking a lot of things personally, and I know it's not easy, but please keep this in mind because this is how fights break out unintentionally. * 2) When uncertain about being attacked, give the benefit of the doubt. Keep in mind how difficult it is to convey emotion over the Internet; unless it's blaringly evident that a poster means you harm, it's quite possible none was intended. (Not all of us like decorating our posts with smilies in order to take any possibly-perceived edge off.) Ask for clarification if necessary. * 3) When replying to someone in order to express your differing opinion, show respect and tolerance for that user; if you disagree with him or her, state why. Do not simply denounce the poster and ridicule his or her ideas. Keep in mind he or she likely believes with the same passion as you. * 4) If you have nothing nice to say, then do *not* press the POST REPLY button. This forum does not exist for you personally to release steam. * 5) Do not jump right in the middle of threads when you have absolutely nothing positive to contribute. * 6) Do yourself a favour and STAY OUT of threads where you know you will not be able to control yourself: for example, if you believe very strongly in God, then for crying out loud stay out of a thread that says \"Atheists only.\" * 7) When starting your own threads containing your own ideas, be prepared for dissent and WELCOME it; if you are unable to entertain the notion that maybe, just maybe, you're not absolutely right, then there is no room for discussion so don't even bother bringing it up. * 8) If you feel you are being attacked and need help, contact a moderator; do not contribute to the fight. * [/b] oh yea, that's from here: http://www.dreamviews.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=21995 i guess my medicine allows me to become more observational of site rules. have a good day! cd

[kimpossible]

I thought it was a great piece of advice.

[Cyclic13]

you can take that comment how you want to, I meant what I said. If you arent taking medicine I think you should get checked out for some. Maybe something for pathological lying and delusional fantasies. Oh, and please dont post those rules. I've read them, and I think I've been quite civil in my dealings with you. If you cant take mild criticism you shouldnt be starting the ridiculous topics that you do in the first place. I have no problems with anyone as long as they dont spout ridiculous rhetoric as the truth... If you still cant seem to help yourself then please do us all a favor and start topics in the senseless banter section next time...

[Ex Nine]

I think a few billion other occultists have already beaten you to this. Your emphasis on the "manipulative" goals of supernatural study is not changed by the addition of a term you heard in a video game.

[cd27]

um...explain Ex? cd

[Ex Nine]

Your emphasis on the manipulation of the supernatural is occultism in a nutshell. You've just changed the wording. Also, the interconnectedness of being and the notion that reality is illusory is, well, the basis for a thousand world traditions.

[cd27]

interesting..and what is occultism? i've never encountered it before. cd

[eXistenZ]

Once I read quite old book (1945) by Whateley Carington: "Telepathy". He employed the term "psyconic" or something similar (I didn't read the original version) and it was in some way similar to your personal theory. More exactly, he theorized that our thoughts are associated to other thoughts in an infinite chain, thus nothing really exist in the usually understood way; all is within this system of associations. He used this theory to explain telepathy, but it can be used for other purposes too, like cosmogony or ontology. eXistenZ

[Ex Nine]

Originally posted by cd27 interesting..and what is occultism? i've never encountered it before. It's a very broad subject and I'm surprised you haven't encountered it, given your ideas. I'm sure can find out quite a bit at your local search engine. As I understand it, there are only two assertions. 1) There are "supernatural" phenomena, which come from a supernatural world, distinct from the natural world and natural phenomena. And 2) people may consciously affect or be consciously affected by the supernatural. Occultist philosophies are wide and intersect with one another, but they all rely on these two assumptions. I don't understand why people must separate one world from another, if they are going to insist that both phenomena are "real." Why not contain them in the same universal system? That's science!

[cd27]

Originally posted by Ex Nine It's a very broad subject and I'm surprised you haven't encountered it, given your ideas. I'm sure can find out quite a bit at your local search engine. as i have said before, i seem to have come up with all of this (or most of it) with no outside influence...which kinda freaks me out somewhat. I don't understand why people must separate one world from another, if they are going to insist that both phenomena are \"real.\" Why not contain them in the same universal system? That's science![/b] lol...that's exactly what i've done in my theory.....so is it science? cd

[kimpossible]

Waaaiit - but elsewhere you talked about your extensive research into ghosts and stuff. So which is it: You've never read ANYTHING on the topic, or you've done extensive research? Not knowing the word "occult" is just ludicrous. It's used all over the forum that you pimp. It's used all over this forum all the time too.

[cd27]

it may be used, but i have never seen any definition of it. cd

[Ex Nine]

Originally posted by cd27 it may be used, but i have never seen any definition of it. It makes sense now. Oh, of course not! Why would you look up a word you don't understand. It's so much more fun to just make up meanings for it. Our minds create reality, after all.

[kimpossible]

So which is it: You've done extensive research or you haven't?

[cd27]

extensive research on PSIONICS, SPIRITS, GHOSTS DIMENSIONS, NOT electronics, or anything of that nature. my study is purely supernatural. i do however, have a bit here and there, enough to make decent ideas and designs, but not enough to carry them out. this is why i have chosen this course for college. cd

[kimpossible]

Ok, so you've read: The New Encyclopedia of the Occult by John Greer and The Occult: The Ultimate Book for Those Who Would Walk With the Gods by Colin Wilson and Art and Symbols of the Occult : Images of Power and Wisdom by James Wasserman Right? Those are must-reads... All of them had "Occult" in the title. What did you think it meant? Let's face it: If you didn't know what "occult" meant, you've done no research into anything related,

[Serkat]

You're trying to start a sect, congratulations.

[cd27]

nope never read any of those books. i read mostly internet articles (professional sites). i go to multiple forum sites and find out as much as i can. what's the diff in a published novel and an article on the internet? nothing, they're both someone else's oppinion of the topic at hand. i for one do not have ANY money, and find it hard to go out and buy books like that to read. so i must turn to my only source, the internet. cd

[Ex Nine]

Originally posted by cd27 nope never read any of those books. i read mostly internet articles (professional sites). Does that mean you pay for these articles? i go to multiple forum sites and find out as much as i can. what's the diff in a published novel and an article on the internet? nothing, they're both someone else's oppinion of the topic at hand.[/b] Although it may be convenient to think that, it only appears that way on the surface. Perhaps the main diff is that authors of books have something called \"editors.\" These second parties help the author with almost everything, checking for errors, helping organize thoughts, but, above all, making sure the message is clear, understandable, and presentable, the meaning of which goes way beyond making it look pretty. Every book you read was made by a team - not so for forum posts. But that's not the only diff. Authors of books take much longer to write things. They are also paid for their work. Often their livelihood depends on the quality of their ideas. They are likely to have more resources available. I could go on and on. Oh, and for crying out loud - a novel is fiction. It doesn't have to have anyone's opinion on anything. If you don't see any difference between your posts and fiction, I have to think that is a serious problem. i for one do not have ANY money, and find it hard to go out and buy books like that to read. so i must turn to my only source, the internet.[/b] How is it that you go to professional sites, then? You must think they're professional because they have advertisements? There's an ad in your signature. That must mean you're a professional, then, huh?

[Merlock]

Hmm, what a curious situation. A few posters here seem to ignore possible future consequences of their own actions. Ex Nine, you criticize the ideas stated here and yet you seem to not be cautious of the...let's say, subjectivity of the minds of people in this world. Now, to cd27's point of view, you are being hostile to his actions here. Now, considering his interests including an urge for power, if you were to look at the situation objectively, would you not agree that you are in danger? Not imminent danger but in danger of possible revenge nonetheless. I'm not talking about the particular ideas stated here and not saying that they will lead to success in gaining power or failure. What I am saying is that a goal is enough...when one strives towards something, one will achieve it in the end as long as the devotion never fades; for it is merely a matter of finding the right "path" towards the goal. Thus, simply looking at this thread I thought I'd notice a curious aspect such as this...

[cd27]

interesting.....ex nine....you have made your point very well, and offered great advice (harshly i might add), yet i fail to see how you have offered ANY assistance or help to the situation. you have only complained and persecuted, nonetheless, your posts are worth something in my point of view. i myself have written two novels, and i know of the system which you speak of, and you are wrong in one aspect: Oh, and for crying out loud - a novel is fiction. It doesn't have to have anyone's opinion on anything.[/b] oh, and for crying out loud....not all novels are FICTION....they can be anything. and yes, it can be someone's oppinion on anything and i've seen many novels, small books, and even factual novels purely based on informatino giving the author's oppinion. i hate to say it, but you simply know nothing of novels do you? as for Merlock...i like you style of thinking. i am, however, not revengful, for reveng is a showing of ignorance, which i am not in that subject nor in the subjects i study. i see that this entire argument (if you can even call it that) is because a few people do not believe in psychic phenomena and they refute everything that they see about it. i have posted several times and have been attacked each and every time by the EXACT SAME PEOPLE. a philosophy is a way of thinking, a simple way one believes and thinks, must i PROVE to you the way i think? i hope not. if that is what you request, you are the one who needs much learning. this thread is about Psineticism Philosophy, correct? the belief in psychic phenomena is much related, it is a belief and i for one do not have to prove to you that it is real or that it even works. simply because i do not know the meaning of one simple word (yes i have seen multiple times), it does not mean that i do not know about what i speak. i wouldn't call myself a professinoal, as professionals get paid. my designs are different from anything kimpossible has ever even dreamed up, and i highly doubt he/she could even try to make the device, much less understand its purpose. simply because i can not prove something exists, or that i know for sure what i'm talking about, does not mean for one moment that i am not what i say. i do NOT lie. never have. and never plan to. if you don't believe me, what's the point in even commenting on it? answer that for me? don't even click the reply button. it doesn't apply to you, so just be quiet about it. if you think it is all ignorant to believe in this stuff, fine,t aht's you're belief, but i won't go around and call you a liar and do all this crap to you because of it. hardly. i respect people's beliefs, i don't trash them. now are we going to talk about psineticism or are we just going to sit here and yap our freaking mouths? cd

[TygrHawk]

nov·el1 ( P ) Pronunciation Key (nvl) n. A fictional prose narrative of considerable length, typically having a plot that is unfolded by the actions, speech, and thoughts of the characters.