Originally Posted by Cypocryphy
Dear Burned-Up:
Thank you for the great reply, and I did show her my dream--and she liked it.
Well done. :bravo:
Sounds like the two of you have a great relationship.
That being said, I want to posit a question to you: If a person comforts us and soothes us, is that not a form of love, and wouldn't it be better for that basic form of love to be complimented with sexual love?
There are so many definitions of love - as you've demonstrated by referring to two in your reply.
I can't think of any theory or belief that backs up your thoughts nor contradicts them. So if you say that comforting love compliments sexual love then you've made a connection that feels right for you.
And sex can be comforting as well as exciting.
Comforting love is probably the first type of love we learn - i.e. when we're first held as babies and clearly long before we know about sex. And we crave that love for the rest of our lives (probably). Many people know how to self-soothe (warm bath, nice music etc) but some (I have heard figures of up to 30%) have never learned to do this and tend to form highly narcisistic relationships, believing that the other person should comfort them and feeling hurt and angry when they don't. We all probably recognise that to at least some degree.
The alternative to this would be sexual intimacy first, and then the hope that comfort would follow, as if the sexual act opens the door to something more. And, in reality, does not this act often sabotage comfort? Is it not uncomfortable to be so intimate with someone without having the basis of friendship to create a level of security, so sexual intimacy can be expressed fully?
That is my belief based on my experience, yes. But again I would be reluctant to generalise. Some people seem to be very secure, including secure in the sexual nature of their bodies, that they can enjoy sex without needing to form attachments with their sexual partner for any other reason than that. Others, probably like you and I from what I can make out, would rather be sexual with someone we already feel comfortable with.
Perhaps your scenario of tangled emotions occurs when there is an imbalance of feeling between the parties concerned. Nevertheless, if a man and a woman are best friends, the other aspect to a loving relationship must be inevitable, unless of course major external obstacles are present.
I wouldn't say inevitable (see my earlier statements) but yes, I would expect to sexually desire a woman I have become close to in other ways. Unless there are other reasons that work in opposition (e.g. if they have poor hygeine!).
Not sure what you mean by imbalance. You mean when one person is in love (sexual desire?) and one isn't? Well, that can be awkward, yes. It's hard to know what to do with strong feelings when their object isn't reciprocating. But that's a form of narcissism. We're really in love with our fantasy of the other person, not the person we experience in the moment.
Well, that's a whole lot of babbling. Thanks again for replying. I understand the point of view you shared for I too have entertained it. Nonetheless, such a perspective uses the framework of pessimism, and I, being in love, cannot not be anything but an optimist. Ha!
Take care and thank you again for the great reply!
My pleasure. You have a great chance of engaging with someone about real feelings here without needing to become manipulative. Sex is not inevitable, but it is the result of a choice that two people can make. Why is it, I wonder, why two people can't talk about this in the same way as they talk about what time to meet or what to have for tea? Well, some can. But from what I can make out most people just "fall into bed" or say "it just happened, we didn't mean it to".
Thanks for the interesting discussion. Hope all goes well for you.
|
|
Bookmarks