Originally posted by TheUnknown
Perigrinus, if it wasn't for scientists.. the human race would be stronger today then ever. Its because of your cures for measles that we now have a weakened gene pool. Yet people wonder why there's so much cancer. Oh no, it would make sense to blame their cellphones, or their zero-calorie sweetner for that. People would rather blame something that can be safely blamed. Wouldn't it be insane if I called pennicillan a horrible invention, yet because of it we now have antibiotic-resistant strains of bacteria.
We came from a world that was natuarally regulated, and took it over. I don't deny it was inevidable, everything happened for a reason. The end is coming however, the bomb is one of the least of our worries.
Are you serious?
The pursuit of medicine is as old as the human species itself. Folk remedies are known throughout the world and are passed down from generation to generation as treatments for common ailments. Pharmaceutical medicine is simply the advancement via the application of modern biology and chemistry of the preexisting search for cures to human illnesses. It is not new. It is simply newly successful. I am not defending the myriad flaws of the pharmaceutical system (over-priced drugs unavailable to those who need them, over-prescription of drugs out of convenience rather than necessity, a common disregard for the holistic nature of human health, etc); however, what you are suggesting is that the search for treatment is itself bad – that that historical human pursuit of seeking the physical salvation of our loved ones is bad because such a pursuit desires to fight what you seem to regard as our natural destiny as determined by bacterial infection. When a cat eats grass to clear a painful digestive tract, is that “going against nature”? Is the cat “naturally” supposed to suffer? If the clot is (without the aid of grass) severe enough that the cat is unable to eat and perishes, is that it’s destiny, nature’s way of balancing the population, weeding out the weak? I guess I should go telepathically commune with my cats and tell them that the next time they’re feeling sick, they shouldn’t go eat the grass in the backyard, but rather sit there and take it like the neutered men that they are. Of course, it could be that the weak are those that are not intelligent enough to know about the grass cure – there are many measures of strength.
Honestly, you think people should be allowed to die, that science should turn away from its healing pursuit because diseases balance the population, allowing natural selection to do its work more efficiently? That having children die early somehow brings us as a species in closer communion with the laws of nature? The most developed countries – those with the best access to modern medicine, namely western Europe and North America – have the lowest birth rates and also statistically healthier populations than developing countries. Countries without modern medicine have not only the highest birth rates, but also the fastest growing populations on the planet. These are not populations of healthy, happy, strong, disease-resistant people. The are starving and dying of diseases that can be prevented with a single vaccination. Diseases are not strengthening the populations of those countries – those people have been suffering the same diseases since human beings first inhabited those areas. As our immune systems evolve, the diseases evolve. It's a biological arms race. You said that because of pennicilin, we now have anti-biotic resistant strains of bacteria. Well, before pennicilin, even the non-resistant strains killed thousands of people. Diseases don’t slow population growth. They simply add to human suffering.
Tell me, if your mother or father, brother or sister, or child were suffering from the ravages of a painful and, in the absence of modern medicine, ultimately terminal disease, would you really rather watch them endure daily, almost unbearable pain rather than support the science that would allow you to walk to the doctor’s office and come back with a cure in a bottle?
|
|
Bookmarks