DEEP OVER ANALYZING blather?!?!
If only I was less observant

I think the test of observation getting a simple anwser incorrect i.e. the flush one, proves that this is not a good test of observation. It more of a test of ignorance and easy anwsered, if it wasen't then I wouldn't be able to do this http://www.snopes.com/science/coriolis.asp . Sorry Skysaw the person who wrote this test got a question wrong, now this pretty much proves this is a crappy test and is shallow and not observent. Seriously, three minautes in google would have gave the person who wrote this the correct anwsered, but no. http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en...s+toilet&meta=
I guess it is too hard to write coriolis and toilet into google.