Quote Originally Posted by memeticverb View Post
Your kidding right? Those links you posted have been discredited a while ago. The one that does the best job of pretending to seriously challenge the arguments of the most credible individuals is The Journal of Debunking 911 Conspiracy Theories. The article I just read chooses Dr. David Griffin, a theologian as its target instead of addressing the scientific research done by many professors, scientists, and engineers. But even in attacking Dr. Griffin they fail to make any breaches in his arguments, while trying to use mere opinions given by NIST as somehow supporting their arguments. I would like to see any independent researcher with as good a background as any one of the members of AE911Truth, as well as engage the evidence and not make -pseudo-arguments with no empirical support.
You looked at all of that information? Those links proivide more links which provide more links. There is a whole universe of information in there. You can find plenty of engineering experts in there even though the vast, vast majority of engineering experts don't think this issue is even worth acknowledging.

But my point here is that I had provided links. You said I had not. You were wrong. You are also wrong in saying I have not made arguments. Read again.

Quote Originally Posted by memeticverb View Post
And I havnt checked this out, but it looks like it might make some valid points for those like UM who think one must be a "demolition" or some other expert to know certain facts...
Wrong again. Read again. (I keep needing to tell you that.) I said I am not expert enought to get into the full extent of the demolition argument with people like you. You obviously have no qualms about making stuff up, and the same is true about most of the 9/11 conspiracy theorists I have talked to. I don't know enough about demolition to tell you when you are making things up about demolition. So I don't get too much into that part of the argument. Got it? Tell the truth next time.

You need to see the History Channel's documentary on 9/11 conspiracy claims. It has plenty of experts making a circus out of the 9/11 conspiracy concept, but both sides are represented equally. They basically take turns making their points, and the major issues we have covered in here are covered.