Thread: Meet Kevin...the Real Father of Bristol Palin's Baby!

I still don't understand why people blame Sarah Palin for her daughters pregnancy, her daughter is her own person, if Sarah Palin talked to her daughter about getting "knocked up" it still dosen't really matter, her daughter makes her own choices and if she decided to lie to her parents and go get knocked up it's her choice, in 2007 Al Gores son was arrested on a driving incident, you don't see the media all over that, and wasent he supposed to "talk" to his son about driving under the influence of narcotics?

Originally Posted by Jeff777

Personally speaking...I'm at a loss for words right now. He seems moderately convincing and it would clear up the hush hush about the pregnancy in the beginning but...I just don't know. He said he will go public with pictures and phone records TOMORROW ON SEPTEMBER 11TH OF 2008 if Bristol Palin doesn't contact him. If this is true...presupposing it is...this will be the ultimate death nail on the McCain/Palin campaign. I suppose we shall have to wait and see...

~ Discuss.

Very interesting, I hope it does turn out he's the father. I may just have to check out the news tomorrow! Post any updates if you find any.

Originally Posted by Volcon

I still don't understand why people blame Sarah Palin for her daughters pregnancy...

I don't think it's so much about focusing on Bristol Palin as much as it is if it's true it makes Palin out to be a liar whose seeking out what's best for her campaign...by any means. If this is true...then Palin is a liar, and Levi is just a tool.

Originally Posted by nitsuJ

Very interesting, I hope it does turn out he's the father. I may just have to check out the news tomorrow! Post any updates if you find any.

Sure thing

Originally Posted by Volcon

I still don't understand why people blame Sarah Palin for her daughters pregnancy, her daughter is her own person, if Sarah Palin talked to her daughter about getting "knocked up" it still dosen't really matter, her daughter makes her own choices and if she decided to lie to her parents and go get knocked up it's her choice, in 2007 Al Gores son was arrested on a driving incident, you don't see the media all over that, and wasent he supposed to "talk" to his son about driving under the influence of narcotics?

I saw the media all over it. They're giving her hell over it because she's supposed to be all about abstinence and her daughter got knocked up, she was also trying to hide it in the beginning. Palin's lucky they're only going after her about this and not other stupid things she's done.

I saw the media all over it. They're giving her hell over it because she's supposed to be all about abstinence and her daughter got knocked up

My father can be all about not drinking, and it's still my choice if i drink or not, even if he lectures me i could lie about going to the movies and instead go to a party and drink. Are you saying he would be to blame if i decided to drink?

Originally Posted by Volcon

My father can be all about not drinking, and it's still my choice if i drink or not, even if he lectures me i could lie about going to the movies and instead go to a party and drink. Are you saying he would be to blame if i decided to drink?

You can certainly control your kids and make sure they don't do something. So sure, it is half of his fault. If he really wanted to make sure you didn't drink, he could follow you around places.

I don't really care about her daughter being pregnant, but if it turns out they lied about the real father of the kid then they're going to get hell.

The main thing I don't like about Palin is how she was against gay marriage and allowed gay state workers benefits and not the rest of Alaska.

Originally Posted by nitsuJ

You can certainly control your kids and make sure they don't do something. So sure, it is half of his fault. If he really wanted to make sure you didn't drink, he could follow you around places.

I don't really care about her daughter being pregnant, but if it turns out they lied about the real father of the kid then they're going to get hell.

The main thing I don't like about Palin is how she was against gay marriage and allowed gay state workers benefits and not the rest of Alaska.

Control is not that easy though, unless you have one of those new nifty GPS phones, anyhoo, she woulden't be able to watch her kid 24/7 though, it's not her life, or her choices, or her path, her daughter is the one that decides what happens in her life. The moment her daughter thought of having un-protected sex, Sarah Palin was out of the picture, it was up to her daughter to have the common sense to not get pregnant, and to think through her choices. You can lead a camel to water, but you can't make it drink. Sarah can teach her daughter smart choices, but she can't make her use her better judgement, you can't teach common sense, that was up to her daughter to learn.

Is this serious? "You know, I'm working on my urban rap career". Fucking no talent hack rapper trying to get famous.

It doesn't really matter if it's her moms fault. Sarah has one retarted kid(2 if you count the one in the military) and a pregnant teenage daughter. If you have those kinds of responsiblities you shouldn't be running for any political office, let alone VP of the US.

She could keep tabs on the kid and have her under constant supervision, but as I've said, I could care less about the pregnancy. There's other things Palin did that was dumb.

Originally Posted by Volcon

My father can be all about not drinking, and it's still my choice if i drink or not, even if he lectures me i could lie about going to the movies and instead go to a party and drink. Are you saying he would be to blame if i decided to drink?

If your father is running on a ticket to nab the two most-influential political offices in America (some say "the world"----?), it matters what family members do who live in his home (i.e. under his influence) if he isn't upfront about it or even lying about it in order to advance his political career.

Originally Posted by nitsuJ

She could keep tabs on the kid and have her under constant supervision, but as I've said, I could care less about the pregnancy. There's other things Palin did that was dumb.

True. And, for some reason, Dems are having a hard time airing her OBVIOUS faux-paus. Or maybe no one can hear them over Palin's incessant denial of her support for the infamous Bridge to Nowhere.

Originally Posted by nitsuJ

YI don't really care about her daughter being pregnant, but if it turns out they lied about the real father of the kid then they're going to get hell.

I agree.. pregnancy happens (parents influence or no) but lying about the father because you don't want the father to be Black is the real issue in my eyes and tells alot about her character.

I guess we'll all know the truth once the baby is born..

.

It doesn't help the Republicans case when they have Rush Limbaugh and Bill O'Reilly calling Jamie Lynn Spears parents "pinheads" and blaming them for their daughter getting pregnant...yet when it is Palin's child they pretend it is okay.

I don't think most people view her underage daughter getting pregnant as a bad thing because they know it happens. The Republicans are the ones who have always made a big deal out of equating teen pregnancy with bad parenting.

As for the clown on YouTube claiming he is the father, I don't believe it for a second.

Look! If you can't control your daughter then HOW do you expect to rule a nation? Doesn't matter how her daughter did it, she just did. Unfortunately Palin couldn't prevent it so that being said, too bad.

I think that Sarah Palin's Down Syndrome baby is actually Bristol Palin's first child.

Hear me out on this...

Spoiler for Click to read:

The idea that Trig, the down syndrome baby, may not be Sarah Palin's child but her daughter Bristol's is just starting to float around the net. A lot of news networks are not giving this play and the Democrats haven't said anything on this, however this is starting to gain some momentum on the net and I decided, "WTF, why not just look into it and see what the whackos are babbling about."

Now it turns out I'm one of the wackos that think there may be some volatility in the idea that there may be a cover-up going on here. Let me explain and PLEASE do try to keep an open mind. I'm not attacking Palin, nor am I trying to sling any dirt. I'm just confused by photo and video evidence versus what Sarah is saying.




First, Sarah said nothing to friends, co-workers or the media, and showed no signs of pregnancy when she announced she was 8 months pregnant. That's right... Let me say it again. The first time anyone knew she was pregnant was when she announced it one month prior to Trig being born.

Alaskan news outlets commented on this, but did not go further as Sarah maintained a 'no-comment' attitude about this.

Now here is the article of her at Super Tuesday (just a month before the baby was born and two days after she announced she was eight months pregnant).

And here is the picture from the article. Does she look like she is about to give birth in 3-4 weeks?

Next up, Sarah stated she leaked some water and had two contractions prior to a speech in Dallas, but ignored the signs and stayed for a few hours in Dallas after the contractions to give her speech. An aid came to her side and she then left quickly for the airport. She took a flight to Seattle, then waited for a connecting flight to Anchorage, then her husband drove her 45 minutes to their small home town hospital.

The flight was over eight hours long. She started having signs around noon, checked into her hospital around 11:30pm, and she 'delivered' the baby around midnight. She did not inform the airline that she was pregnant or how far along she was (some airlines don't let women fly if they are +7 months along)

(Quote from the Article Above):
"Governor Palin was extremely pleasant to flight attendants and her stage of pregnancy was not apparent by observation as she didn't show any signs of distress," Boren said.


Sarah Palin appeared 4 months before the baby's birth in Vogue magazine, with pictures taken when she would have been five months along. The article reported she was "trim and lithe." (sorry, can't find pics from the article)

Found a pic just after 'Super Tuesday'

Doesn't look eight months pregnant does she?

"The Damning Photo" as it's called is a picture the Palin family (minus their adult son) at home. It was printed in the Anchorage Daily News, taken six weeks before Trig's birth on March 9th.

Which one looks pregnant? Sarah or her daughter?

An Alaskan PodShow Podcast called Hike of the Week has Sarah Palin talking with the host and taking a tour of Juno, AK with the host. When this podcast was taped, she was seven and a half months pregnant. (She had not announced yet she was pregnant. How many women do you know are going to walk all over town like this?)

Sarah Palin did state that Bristol left school for an extended period of time, due to mononucleosis according to her family for the last 5 months of Trig's pregnancy. Mono kept a teenager out of school for 5 months?

(side note: Over this new pregnacy my prediction is a miscarriage.)

Add it up it sounds like there is a cover up and my problem with Palin is if she is willing to create a cover up of something so MINOR wtf will she do in office?

I was thinking about why Sarah would have her daughter fake a pregnacy. What would be to gain here? The only thing I can think of is that the Palin family could use this 'pregnacy' to say that it is proof that her daughter was pregnant at the time Trig was still developing so it couldn't be the daughter's son.

Unless Palin sees having a daughter giving birth out of wedlock a killer to her politcal career (which is based on family values and abstinance) and wanted to cover that little problem up, I just don't see what is to be gained.

Beyond that, wouldn't there be doctors and nurses that were around during the birth? Palin is the Govenor...so she doesn't have a lot of power....not nearly enough to keep hospital staff quiet. Maybe to doctor medical records but not to shut up staff.

Then again I may be wrong but the photo and video evidence is pretty damning.

Originally Posted by Elis D.

I think that Sarah Palin's Down Syndrome baby is actually Bristol Palin's first child.

Hear me out on this...

Spoiler for Click to read:

The idea that Trig, the down syndrome baby, may not be Sarah Palin's child but her daughter Bristol's is just starting to float around the net. A lot of news networks are not giving this play and the Democrats haven't said anything on this, however this is starting to gain some momentum on the net and I decided, "WTF, why not just look into it and see what the whackos are babbling about."

Now it turns out I'm one of the wackos that think there may be some volatility in the idea that there may be a cover-up going on here. Let me explain and PLEASE do try to keep an open mind. I'm not attacking Palin, nor am I trying to sling any dirt. I'm just confused by photo and video evidence versus what Sarah is saying.




First, Sarah said nothing to friends, co-workers or the media, and showed no signs of pregnancy when she announced she was 8 months pregnant. That's right... Let me say it again. The first time anyone knew she was pregnant was when she announced it one month prior to Trig being born.

Alaskan news outlets commented on this, but did not go further as Sarah maintained a 'no-comment' attitude about this.

Now here is the article of her at Super Tuesday (just a month before the baby was born and two days after she announced she was eight months pregnant).

And here is the picture from the article. Does she look like she is about to give birth in 3-4 weeks?

Next up, Sarah stated she leaked some water and had two contractions prior to a speech in Dallas, but ignored the signs and stayed for a few hours in Dallas after the contractions to give her speech. An aid came to her side and she then left quickly for the airport. She took a flight to Seattle, then waited for a connecting flight to Anchorage, then her husband drove her 45 minutes to their small home town hospital.

The flight was over eight hours long. She started having signs around noon, checked into her hospital around 11:30pm, and she 'delivered' the baby around midnight. She did not inform the airline that she was pregnant or how far along she was (some airlines don't let women fly if they are +7 months along)

(Quote from the Article Above):
"Governor Palin was extremely pleasant to flight attendants and her stage of pregnancy was not apparent by observation as she didn't show any signs of distress," Boren said.


Sarah Palin appeared 4 months before the baby's birth in Vogue magazine, with pictures taken when she would have been five months along. The article reported she was "trim and lithe." (sorry, can't find pics from the article)

Found a pic just after 'Super Tuesday'

Doesn't look eight months pregnant does she?

"The Damning Photo" as it's called is a picture the Palin family (minus their adult son) at home. It was printed in the Anchorage Daily News, taken six weeks before Trig's birth on March 9th.

Which one looks pregnant? Sarah or her daughter?

An Alaskan PodShow Podcast called Hike of the Week has Sarah Palin talking with the host and taking a tour of Juno, AK with the host. When this podcast was taped, she was seven and a half months pregnant. (She had not announced yet she was pregnant. How many women do you know are going to walk all over town like this?)

Sarah Palin did state that Bristol left school for an extended period of time, due to mononucleosis according to her family for the last 5 months of Trig's pregnancy. Mono kept a teenager out of school for 5 months?

(side note: Over this new pregnacy my prediction is a miscarriage.)

Add it up it sounds like there is a cover up and my problem with Palin is if she is willing to create a cover up of something so MINOR wtf will she do in office?

I was thinking about why Sarah would have her daughter fake a pregnacy. What would be to gain here? The only thing I can think of is that the Palin family could use this 'pregnacy' to say that it is proof that her daughter was pregnant at the time Trig was still developing so it couldn't be the daughter's son.

Unless Palin sees having a daughter giving birth out of wedlock a killer to her politcal career (which is based on family values and abstinance) and wanted to cover that little problem up, I just don't see what is to be gained.

Beyond that, wouldn't there be doctors and nurses that were around during the birth? Palin is the Govenor...so she doesn't have a lot of power....not nearly enough to keep hospital staff quiet. Maybe to doctor medical records but not to shut up staff.

Then again I may be wrong but the photo and video evidence is pretty damning.

If that is actually her kid and she looked like that at 8 months she should write a book on how she did it. It'll sale better than any other book in history. I love all these "scandal" things she's in. If McCain and her get in office I'm moving to Canada! They'll have this country in it's grave.

Originally Posted by Elis D.

I think that Sarah Palin's Down Syndrome baby is actually Bristol Palin's first child.

Hear me out on this...

Spoiler for Click to read:

The idea that Trig, the down syndrome baby, may not be Sarah Palin's child but her daughter Bristol's is just starting to float around the net. A lot of news networks are not giving this play and the Democrats haven't said anything on this, however this is starting to gain some momentum on the net and I decided, "WTF, why not just look into it and see what the whackos are babbling about."

Now it turns out I'm one of the wackos that think there may be some volatility in the idea that there may be a cover-up going on here. Let me explain and PLEASE do try to keep an open mind. I'm not attacking Palin, nor am I trying to sling any dirt. I'm just confused by photo and video evidence versus what Sarah is saying.




First, Sarah said nothing to friends, co-workers or the media, and showed no signs of pregnancy when she announced she was 8 months pregnant. That's right... Let me say it again. The first time anyone knew she was pregnant was when she announced it one month prior to Trig being born.

Alaskan news outlets commented on this, but did not go further as Sarah maintained a 'no-comment' attitude about this.

Now here is the article of her at Super Tuesday (just a month before the baby was born and two days after she announced she was eight months pregnant).

And here is the picture from the article. Does she look like she is about to give birth in 3-4 weeks?

Next up, Sarah stated she leaked some water and had two contractions prior to a speech in Dallas, but ignored the signs and stayed for a few hours in Dallas after the contractions to give her speech. An aid came to her side and she then left quickly for the airport. She took a flight to Seattle, then waited for a connecting flight to Anchorage, then her husband drove her 45 minutes to their small home town hospital.

The flight was over eight hours long. She started having signs around noon, checked into her hospital around 11:30pm, and she 'delivered' the baby around midnight. She did not inform the airline that she was pregnant or how far along she was (some airlines don't let women fly if they are +7 months along)

(Quote from the Article Above):
"Governor Palin was extremely pleasant to flight attendants and her stage of pregnancy was not apparent by observation as she didn't show any signs of distress," Boren said.


Sarah Palin appeared 4 months before the baby's birth in Vogue magazine, with pictures taken when she would have been five months along. The article reported she was "trim and lithe." (sorry, can't find pics from the article)

Found a pic just after 'Super Tuesday'

Doesn't look eight months pregnant does she?

"The Damning Photo" as it's called is a picture the Palin family (minus their adult son) at home. It was printed in the Anchorage Daily News, taken six weeks before Trig's birth on March 9th.

Which one looks pregnant? Sarah or her daughter?

An Alaskan PodShow Podcast called Hike of the Week has Sarah Palin talking with the host and taking a tour of Juno, AK with the host. When this podcast was taped, she was seven and a half months pregnant. (She had not announced yet she was pregnant. How many women do you know are going to walk all over town like this?)

Sarah Palin did state that Bristol left school for an extended period of time, due to mononucleosis according to her family for the last 5 months of Trig's pregnancy. Mono kept a teenager out of school for 5 months?

(side note: Over this new pregnacy my prediction is a miscarriage.)

Add it up it sounds like there is a cover up and my problem with Palin is if she is willing to create a cover up of something so MINOR wtf will she do in office?

I was thinking about why Sarah would have her daughter fake a pregnacy. What would be to gain here? The only thing I can think of is that the Palin family could use this 'pregnacy' to say that it is proof that her daughter was pregnant at the time Trig was still developing so it couldn't be the daughter's son.

Unless Palin sees having a daughter giving birth out of wedlock a killer to her politcal career (which is based on family values and abstinance) and wanted to cover that little problem up, I just don't see what is to be gained.

Beyond that, wouldn't there be doctors and nurses that were around during the birth? Palin is the Govenor...so she doesn't have a lot of power....not nearly enough to keep hospital staff quiet. Maybe to doctor medical records but not to shut up staff.

Then again I may be wrong but the photo and video evidence is pretty damning.

WOWWOWWOWIEWOW!!!!!!!!! </Christopher Walken impression> hehehe

I'd heard about this but I just assumed it was a rumor.

Originally Posted by stonedape

Sarah has one retarted kid(2 if you count the one in the military)

Fuck you asshole. Congratulations of copying the words of that lame ass comedian somebody posted here a few weeks ago. What makes you so incredible? O yea, YOU'RE A STONER. We do the job people in other countries are forced to do. Show an ounce of gratitude please.

Why should it matter if Sarah Palin's daughter screwed a black struggling rapper from LA? Does it change her policies?

Anyway, sounds like a scam to me. Chances are that that guy doesn't have pictures, and will not post them today, and claim that Republicans called him to threaten him and shut him up, which makes Republicans look like shit. Win win situation for that guy. He makes his party of choice look better, and he gets the word out about his crappy rap music.

One month prior to the birth of Trig


A few days prior to the birth of Trig


Is it even possible to grow that quickly? I don't think it is.

Holy shit ElisD. I thought this story sounded completely ridiculous at first but the photos make it seem true. Both the VP candidates look like they're made of plastic. Biden's super white teeth and tan crack me up. I really don't understand people who use tanning booths.

http://vids.myspace.com/index.cfm?fu...deoid=42658089

Here he tells the truth.

Originally Posted by malac

http://vids.myspace.com/index.cfm?fu...deoid=42658089

Here he tells the truth.

Thank you for posting that Malac. I thought he might be lying because the media would have been all over his ass if their was any shred of truth to it. EVERYONE: THE GUY'S A LIAR Moron wasted my time.