Originally Posted by
juroara
oh oh! I get it!
we need to off the human population, because were so bloody overpopulated....so noble! why don't you start by offing yourself?
:roll:
or do you think we should only off poorer nations, since they are the ones who will suffer the most from any epidemic?
how easy and pathetic it is for you to condemn the poor to death, while you sit comfortable behind a computer
our population is not the cause of global warming or other disasters to our world. its our way of life.
we are a part of nature, and we are the result of nature. nature is the one that gave us the ability to create the technical world that we live in. it is our human nature, and it is nature, that we have done so
does nature pass judgement on those that destroy??
did it pass judgment on the trees that helped cause a mass extinction when the trees poisoned the herbivores? did it pass judgment on the rain, when the rain didn't come and thousands of miles of rain forest - millions of life forms, were swallowed up by a barren desert?
the idea that nature keeps a happy little balance for all its life forms, is bull crap.Nature shows no compassion, as its life forms are caught in a never ending cycle of consuming each other.
The picture has yet to end, and it's not going to end because of man.
Nature can go on just fine with just the bees and flowers. It needs no mammal or birds, or reptiles, or fish.
Change is the only constant. Even if the change is mass extinction.
But who can say that millions of life forms ceasing to exist is wrong? Can nature pass this judgment? It's only MANKIND that passes judgment
Its only mankind that says mass extinction is wrong!
Just as wishing for half the population (or any part of the population) to die a miserable death is wrong. It's not going to save nature. It's not going to save the Earth. It's not even going to change our lifestyle!
Who do you think that half of the population will be?
Half the world is already dying from something. And it is, and will continue to be, the POORER HALF.
Did the starving in africa stop americans from destroying rain forests so they can gorge on hamburgers?
It doesn't matter what you reduce the population to. Half the world suffering hasn't stopped our greedy way of life. So half the world disappearing, won't stop our greedy way of life. Becuase it will be the most richest people who live!!
Consumerism has made us greedy, fat, and ignorant.
Consumerism, the kind we see today was artificially implented, and very carefully implented with subliminal messages - for the benefit of the few. At the cost of the majority!
We've even been manipulated into believing that this consumerism is the best way of life. Despite the fact that research has shown us, consumermism has made us unhappy! It's making us obiese! Were getting cancers from the artificial crap consumerism creates! It's raping our natural recources, lowering our incomes with its race to the bottom, creating poverty nations away, and keeping the poor...........poor.
Who do you think we'll get a vaccine quicker? Who do you think we'll never be able to get the vaccine?
What makes you so positive that this new virus............was made by the fury of nature against man?
Can't man create viruses? Full knowing our economics will pit the new virus against certain nations?
Seriously, think about what you are suggesting. And think about who it really benefits.......The Few.
What a great way to commit genocide! What a great way to get rid of third world countries, and their stupid nature friendly non-capitalistic way of lives. What a great way, to control them as they beg for the vaccine. No money to give us? That's okay. You got something more valuable. Natural recources. And if you don't give us your natural recources, you can die or slave for us.
Don't think something similiar has never happened???........people wake up!!
The concept of 'population versus scarce recources' was created by the few to benefit the few!!!
pssssst....theres enough to go around and we can live entirely green lives
