Originally Posted by
MJMax
I don't know why this is such a controversial subject on DV. -_- It always ends up with people raging that there's no such thing and that there's only levels of awareness, then the topic gets closed. Pretty unfair, IMO. So hear me out.
I actually think that there is such a thing as false lucidity, even if people claim the term is "confusing." For example, I've had a dream that I was someone else, a superhero or something, and I was with another person. We went to sleep in the dream in an attempt to accomplish something. We were "lucid" in that "dream inside a dream," as you could call it. But I had no freaking idea that I was ME, asleep in my bed. And the "rules" that governed this "false lucidity" were nothing like a LD where I was completely aware. I know lucidity does not inherintly mean dream control, but it was more like I thought I was almost remotely controlling a different body. The "dream inside a dream" felt like I was dreaming of having something that I was thinking of as a "lucid dream," but I wasn't thinking of what lucid dreaming actually was. Therefore the dream played out more as a dream than a lucid dream. I know it's confusing.
And I know someone COULD label that as "being lucid with an extremely low level of awareness," but again, I dreamed of going to sleep with someone and waking up in a lucid dream. My idea of a lucid dream wasn't clear because my sense of logic was so low, and therefore it held little resemblance to a real lucid dream.
Yeah you "know you're asleep," but you don't know that it's YOU who's asleep in YOUR bed, and your idea of sleep is changed because of the low sense of logic of a normal dream.
I know Naiya says there's no such thing, no need to quote her. But having such strong negative reactions to the idea is ridiculous. Even if it's a "confusing term," that doesn't mean it's not worth discussing. It's the best way to describe certain near-lucid experiences IMO, so no need to shut the idea out.