Originally posted by Darkmatic
I have been trying to ponder the subject of laughter ...
Hmmmmm.
I once read in this thin treatice written in French (with my limited ability to read French) that Human Beings find two things humorous: ambiguity and mortality. If some phrase is used ostensively in one context, but has a significant second meaning, then it is funny, and people would be prone to laugh. 'Mortality' encompasses issues of life and death and the restrictions and conditions of being an animal, as opposed to being a pure and perfect Spiritual Being, and so 'clumsiness' is funny, references to 'poop' are funny, sex, etc.
But, even if these matters of Ambiguity and Mortality are humorous, we need to wonder what it is that first made Homo Sapien laugh about it.
Darkmatic says that only humans laugh. Well, technically yes. But we can say that only because of the word we use for it. We call that noise a laugh and relate it to humor and so of course we can then limit laughter to our species. But if we call it "howling" and then we have plenty of Primates that howl. Now, why do primates howl... or more particularly what makes us 'howl' with laughter.
Human Beings are Social and Gregarious. We are also highly dependent upon learned behavior and more than most other animals, liberated from instinct. As former Apes we came out of the Trees and adapted to life in completely different environments, and so it was necessary to abandon instinct and begin to learn. Well, how is learning done? In the Social Context, we have rewards and punishments. Smiles good. Laughs bad. Conforming Behavior -- smile. Clumsy behavior or use of ambiguous language -- laugh. Ridicule is a powerful Socializing Tool, and it rests upon laughter. Those who laugh together are confirmed in the Social Group. Those who are laughed at are being corrected or set apart.
I'm sure if we observe some of the higher Primates long enough, we will catch them howling at each other in much the same way as we use laughter in ridicule -- as a social corrective. We would say that these Apes are not so much laughing as yelling at each other. But yelling is very close to Agression. Well, some people react agressively to being laughed at, but it is considered as over-reacting. Laughing is certainly a gentler corrective then yelling. As a foreigner in the Far East, I would hear the giggles that would accompany my linguistic mis-steps. I would realize that hostility was not the intent, but only that I should then ask what word I was using 'ambiguously'. It was laughter as a learning tool. Where it would be agressive to show a negative emotion in order to correct a language mistake, which would make Language more trouble than it is worth, the 'laugh' evolved as an easier alternative. Additionally, the enjoyable nature of a Laugh would encourage the peers and companions of the one being laughed at, to take note of whatever mistake, discrepancy or ambiguity occassioned the laughter. One does not want to do what others are laughing at. Also, it seems to be a positive role in one's Society to be able to be the one to start the laughter -- to point out instances of clumsiness or linguistic ambiguity in others -- the first Teachers were Insult Comics.
Yes, I enjoy a good laugh, and I like to make other people laugh... but after this essay, it now dawns on me that there is a significant difference between Smiles and Laughs. Smiles are positive rewards. But laughs are a mitigated way of howling at somebody.
|
|
Bookmarks