Lucid Dreaming Wikipedia entry

[Identity X]

I've made an ammendment to the Wikipedia entry for dreaming, the berk who wrote it originally forgetting to mention lucid dreaming save one sentence, and the accompanied 'it is said that you can...' rubbish, as if LDing where legendary or something. I've tried to make it as concise as possible, yet still keping it informative and, hopefully, wanting the reader to continue with his studies. It's http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dreaming#Lucid_Dreaming Criticism is very welcome indeed, but if you are thinking of ammending it, tell me beforehand? Thanks.

[Identity X]

Oh shit I just realised theres already a more in-depth section on lucid dreaming. Oh well might as well leave it there as an introduction, it isn't clogged up with research histories etc.

[Seeker]

Looks good though! I just wish dreamviews was in the external links list

[Identity X]

I've added it Seeker, now I hope I'm responsible for a stream of newbies.

[Seeker]

Originally posted by Identity X I've added it Seeker, now I hope I'm responsible for a stream of newbies. Thank you. I hold you responsible!

[CT]

wow, just clicked on a link, didnt knwo about lucidnet.co.uk, *reads*

[incubusfunkman]

well done, nice little section on lucid dreaming Rock on Peace-matt

[Placebo]

Looks pretty good Nice job

[Kaniaz]

but if you are thinking of ammending it, tell me beforehand? Thanks.[/b] No point saying that- on Wikipedia you can jump in an edit anything without permisson from anybody whatsoever. I've made some contributions to wikipedia, see: Reality Checks False Awakening And not so lucid dreaming related: Are you being served? William in Trouble Of course, not my problem is r3mot asks you to post in the wikibook instead. (no)

[Identity X]

Originally posted by Kaniaz but if you are thinking of ammending it, tell me beforehand? Thanks. No point saying that- on Wikipedia you can jump in an edit anything without permisson from anybody whatsoever. [/b] I know that and I retract the statement, do anything (constructive) you like to it. It was just an appeal to those who respect the opinions of author's regardless of the lack of required authorisation.