(Sorry, this ran a lot longer than I meant it to, but if you'd like, we can move it to Philosophy and continue, because I think it would make a great discussion. 
Also, didn't have time to edit it, so it may or may not be a little fragmented, but it's 5:00 and I'm about to clock out! Haha. I'll check it again when I get home.)
I see where you’re coming from. I simply disagree.
Part of the reason society is so “ready to fall,” which I more or less do agree upon, is because a large number of people are so adamant about reducing everything to “self,” and “separate.” The exact philosophy that you describe is, in my opinion, what causes society to scratch and claw at one another for the sake of “looking out for number one” – the Self.
Before going any further, so we’re on the same page, I do agree with you that the ability to be self-sufficient is absolutely important. No dispute there. Although I think that this trait, like countless others, are best kept in moderation.
A main strength of being self-sufficient and not acknowledging the need for help, is that it causes one to work out problems and dead-ends on their own, forcing them to bend their thinking to get what they perceive to be the most out of their knowledge seeking experience. If a problem becomes difficult to solve, it is important to try to assess the problem on your own. In this way, you get a more complete understanding of the problem at hand. Very true. However, that “complete understanding” is still limited to your own conscious perception, which could prove to be the very “illusion” that you mention trying to stay away from, when it comes to reality.
Seeking guidance when faced with a problem gives you the advantage of seeing possibilities that may have been completely out of the scope of your own conscious perception of the problem. You are conceding to the fact that your way of seeing a problem/solution is not the only correct and/or logical way of seeing it.
If you say to yourself “I want to learn Kung-Fu,” are you going to step up into a dojo and dismiss your sensai and say “Nah, man. I don’t want lessons. I just want to watch so I can teach myself.”? As satisfying to the ego as this may be, you are trading an even More complete understanding of the sought knowledge for the gratification of being “self-taught.” The only reason being self-taught (although it is an Excellent trait to have) seems to be more powerful toward your own goals is because you aren’t allowing any other perspectives from which to see the task at hand. You have no reason to doubt your methods because you have no one’s guidance to present to you what could possibly be a more complete perspective on the problem.
A man gets lost while driving in the city and winds up about 14 miles away from the road that he knows takes him back home. Having “self-sufficiency” engraved in his mind, he decides to drive around on his own, from block to block, until he finds the road and ends up circling the area for close to an hour before finding the road, missing any and all appointments, but gaining the satisfaction of doing it himself and seeing many avenues he’s never seen before.
Another man is in the same situation and, after driving around for 25 minutes, seeing a few roads and sights he’s never seen, he decides to stop and ask for directions. The man he speaks to not only knows the quickest way back to the road that takes him home, but being the nice guy he is, he says “Man, why would you want to take that road? There are like six other ways back to where you’re going, three of them are shorter than the one you took. Two of them, I know are longer, but one is popular because of the scenery, if you’re into that sort of thing. It outlines a canyon that has the best view around thousands of miles. The other one has this great restaurant that you should definitely check out. You said you’re going back to your wife, right? Hell, if you don’t go that way now, you should take her out there, sometime.”
THAT is the glue that bonds society together: the desire to treat one another as an extension of “the Self,” and share any and all knowledge we posses with one another. It’s only an integration of many different perspective that leads to the “most complete” understanding of any one problem/task/situation. Trusting only in what you perceive consciously is likely, almost certainly to leave you with the illusion that your perception is the most complete. Interacting with the subconscious can be very similar in that, many things that are simply outside of your conscious perception, even when dealing with the Self, are mapped out in many different ways in your subconscious mind. It can truly be like talking to another person, and can show you things about your self that you either have completely forgotten, or never consciously knew in the first place.
|
|
Bookmarks