Originally posted by L0s7 4 Lyf3+--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(L0s7 4 Lyf3)</div>
GTA VC = crap, all they did was just add features which left it EXTREMELY lacking in the gameplay department.
GTA 3 = very fun still play it, while i can't stand playing VC for 20 minutes because it's so dull.[/b]
Aaarrgh! Thou dost not notice subtleties wench! How can you even begin to say that GTA 3 is better? After playing Vice City, you notice just how much was wrong with the third one. Graphics, cars, boats, all 'o' that pales in comparison!
<!--QuoteBegin-L0s7 4 Lyf3
San Andreas looks to be just like another VC where all they're going to do is add features and \"improve graphics\" even though the graphics in VC were lackluster IMO. Now Rockstar is trying to rush out as many GTA's as possible to maximize profit it seems, they tried to push VC out as fast as possible for more sales. Only took about a year to finish VC. While GTA 3 was worked on for two or three.
It took 3 years to make GTA 3 because Rockstar had no idea how to make a game like that, the Playstation 2 was still new don't forget. When they made Vice City, they had a solid idea of what they were doing, having done it before.
It's actually not true that it will be very similar, San Andreas will be extremely different. I received an expose' type of thing in a playstation magazine, and there are many different things:
- CJ (the main character) can get fat or build himself up.
- Pedestrians will help other pedestrians instead of just walking past
- Many motorists will fight back rather than let you steal their car, so some pistol whipping or punching will be in order
- Spraying your car will not mask you from the police forever, you can get a haircut or change your clothes to avoid being noticed.
- Four person drive-bys
There's a lot of other stuff, if you feel like argueing more, albeit past me to bag your preferences, i'll be happy to state a few more.
|
|
Bookmarks