loljesus.com being investigated by net authority!

**Manifold_Time** · 07-16-2007 03:25 PM

http://www.netauthority.org/offenders/1791.shtml

This website has been investigated by Net Authority, and has been found to be in violation of the Internet Acceptable Use Policy by posting the following kinds of content:

Pornographic material = legal
Hateful material = legal
Blasphemy = legal
Offensive political material = legal
Bestiality and/or interracial relationships = lolwut?!?!

**Jdeadevil** · 07-16-2007 03:28 PM

I'm not getting curios. It might be a Shock Site, so I'll keep away. HappyPuppies should be taken off the internet aswell, along with TubGirl and Meat Spin, Sites you shouldn't visit.

**Manifold_Time** · 07-16-2007 03:35 PM

What shock site? I don't know if I would categorize loljesus.com as a shock site. It might (actually it WILL) be offensive to religious people though, so enter at your own risk.

**Snooze** · 07-16-2007 03:36 PM

noo, he meant that he doesnt touch links on chats/forums since it might just pop a giant pic of a donkey anally raping a guy or something

**Manifold_Time** · 07-16-2007 03:37 PM

Well that's stupid. Just click the darn link...I doubt the url I posted is a link to meatspin. lmao

**Snooze** · 07-16-2007 03:41 PM

lol yeah. its not a bad site, I linked that site here some weeks ago or so

**Peaceful Dreamer** · 07-16-2007 09:03 PM

That site is awesome.

**Bearsy** · 08-30-2007 01:59 AM

Has anyone read the Net Authority's Acceptable Use Policy?

How to Spot a Violation

While our database contains many of the websites that are in obvious violation of the Internet Acceptable Use Policy, it is not uncommon to come across websites that seem to be fine, but in actuality are some of the worst violators of all. It is these websites that can easily be mistaken for perfectly acceptable content that are the most dangerous to our children.

It is important to keep an eye out, and constantly ask yourself if what you are seeing is in violation or not. Some perfectly innocent looking sites can actually turn out to be blatantly profane sources of perversity for an unsuspecting young child. Instead of trying to enumerate every single thing to look out for, here are some examples for you to learn from and think about.

Example #1: Baby Photos Website. Everybody loves looking at babies! A baby photo website with pictures of babies from all over the world would be a wonderful attraction. There is, however, a common misconception that portraying infants in the nude is an acceptable practice, since the genitalia is not yet well-formed enough to be considered profane. This is far from the case! You and I may not get impure thoughts from looking at innocent babies, but there are perverts out there who do! By providing pictures of babies at all, and especially in the nude, this fictional website would only be fueling these perverts' desires and making society a more dangerous place to live in. This website should certainly be added to our database as a pornography offender.

Example #2: Children's Dinosaur Stories. You might think that a site that contains stories about dinosaurs for children would be innocent—but let's stop and think about that for a moment. If you read the bible (you should, it's great!) you know that dinosaurs never actually existed, and that God put those fossils and bones there to test our faith in Him. While the stories themselves may not contain any offensive material, the simple fact that they are about dinosaurs may cause a child to question his faith in the one true God. By blaspheming, this site is in violation of the Internet Acceptable Use Policy and should be added to our database.

Example #3: Family Farm Website. A personal website detailing one's adventures on the family farm sounds like a lot of fun! Especially if there are photos of the farm animals and equipment. Such a website would be very entertaining to old and young minds alike! But imagine that some of the photos of animals included the animal genitalia in plain sight. This is hardly something that young children should be looking at, and especially not to be associated with the joy of viewing a fun website. By associating a feeling of joy with animal genitalia, this website would be an extreme danger to children and should definitely be added to the Net Authority database as a bestiality offender.

As you can see, even some of the most innocent-seeming websites should actually be considered some of the most offensive and dangerous of all. Keeping this in mind, it should become easier in time for you to spot offensive websites. It is important to report these violations to us using the form below, so that others may benefit from your find as well.
Report a Violation

If you have found a website that is in violation of the Internet Acceptable Use Policy, then please fill out the form below so that it may be added to our database as an offender.

**Bearsy** · 08-30-2007 02:09 AM

1. Thou shalt not post pornographic material.
There is a common misconception that pornography is limited purely to images or textual descriptions of an explicit sexual nature. This is not the case. Anything that can evoke impure thoughts in the mind of the beholder is pornographic.

2. Thou shalt not post hateful material.
Any material that promotes or inspires hatred or violence towards any other person or group of people is strictly forbidden.

3. Thou shalt not post blasphemous material.
Any material that would lead one astray from the righteous path of the one true God must not be permitted on the Internet. These days children are gaining access to the Internet at younger and younger ages—a time when they are most vulnerable and susceptible to blasphemous viewpoints and suggestions.

4. Thou shalt not post materials of an offensive political nature.

5. Thou shalt not post materials concerning bestiality, including interracial relationships.
God did not intend for different species or races to intermingle sexually. Any content that contradicts this natural law, directly or indirectly, is strictly forbidden.

wow, Fundamentalist Christians trying to put a damper on free speech.

WHAT THE FUCK?

**wasup** · 08-30-2007 02:35 AM

I absolutely love how bestiality is paired with interracial relationships.

**wasup** · 08-30-2007 02:47 AM

reading loljesus.com I found the same comment...

What they said:

* Bestiality and/or interracial relationships” – LOL, I love it how they put those on the same level! That one statement is almost more offensive than anything on this site just in the pure ignorance of it!

**Needcatscan** · 08-30-2007 03:34 AM

Just to clarify, the site is a joke, right? I mean, walt disney world is on there. . .

**Bearsy** · 08-30-2007 05:44 AM

netauthority or loljesus?

Netauthority is for serious... the Christians think they can force their prudishness on everyone, just cause they're afraid that if they see a picture of a naked person they'll pop wood.

loljesus, also serious... every picture is an accurate historical document.

**jaasum** · 08-30-2007 06:04 AM

what authority do they have? They can't take sites down, just bitch about them. I should post a family picture on the farm of me and my black wife with our 6 week old naked child in front of our horny horse. See how big of a boner they get from that one.

**jaasum** · 08-30-2007 06:13 AM

OH MY GOD!

They have a airplane modeling site on their block list

AND they have perverted Justice on there. Perverted Justice is an organization stopping pedophiles. HOW THE HELL IS THAT OFFENSIVE? Are they wanting to encourage pedophiles?

And they say sites with baby photos or farm animals should be blocked, well their own fucking site has pictures of babies and farm animals hahahhahah

this HAS to be a joke.

**Bearsy** · 08-30-2007 06:14 AM

Originally Posted by jaasum

what authority do they have? They can't take sites down, just bitch about them. I should post a family picture on the farm of me and my black wife with our 6 week old naked child in front of our horny horse. See how big of a boner they get from that one.

I don't know about them, but if I didn't do something quick BlueBalls would ensue.

j/k thats kinda weird.

if you replace kinda with really... and weird with disturbing.

**jaasum** · 08-30-2007 06:26 AM

I submitted their own site for review, then sent them an email...

because I have nothing else to do.

**♥Mark** · 08-30-2007 06:35 AM

Go here http://www.netauthority.org/submit.shtml and report the hateful site "Net Authority". You see those kids on the main page? Aren't they having fun? Seems innocent, doesn't it? Laying in the grass, carefree. But then you notice the older man, who is clearly Asian, with a sinister look on his face! Just what is going on here!?

**Bonsay** · 08-30-2007 10:13 AM

Apparently god never intended to make kittens. Oh well, I guess they'll have to burn in hell for their sins.

http://www.netauthority.org/offenders/4124.shtml
Maby this thread should just die, the damage this is causing to my internal organs is too great. OMG! Only when I thought that people couldn't get any more stupid. Argh! These should be put in some mental institution, not healthy...