We were talking in the present tense, with regard to violence and torture.
Personally, I don't like this "past" fixation, that is so prominent, like the crusades. So some guys decided to kill some other guys, supposedly in the name of Christianity, but in no way does the bible incite such acts. Therefore we can blame it on individual persons, not Christianity itself. Surely modern Christians cannot be blamed for something some other guys did hundreds of years ago. Modern Christianity is the thing to judge not archaic Christianity because they are evidently different. Don't you think it is unreasonable? It is the equivalent of me blaming modern young white Americans for the imposition of Jim Crow laws on black Americans, earlier this century. When the only affiliation between the two is a cultural tag; it is clearly unreasonable from my perspective.
Although, it was suggested that the anti-homosexuality and pro-life morals in Christianity equate to harsh treatment. Yes Christians disagree with homosexuality, but they don't blindly kill or beat them or orgainise witch hunts nor maliciously ostracise them; it is a fact that true Christians will try to help such individuals with their supposed problem. In the Western world, it is my belief that homophobia does not come from Christianity, but rather the general population. It was officially regarded as a psychological condition until late last century (1970's) in many western countries. I think that as Christians are those who are openly against homosexuality,they become a scapegoat paying the debts of homophobia which is ingrained in society.
Secondly, to the abortion question: Christians oppose abortion as they see it as immoral. Notwithstanding, it is seen by atheists and non christians as an inhibition of liberal freedoms, a inhibition of free choice. Clearly there is a point here, its their body, right; pro choice individuals, as an independent human beings should be able to do as they like, free from persecutive morality! Is this right, I think so.
And yet, by having an abortion, and killing that foetus, a potential human being, wouldn't one also be inhibiting liberal freedoms of that child whose potential life is being terminated, the same freedoms one claims by advocating abortion; it seems like hypocrisy to me.
It seems to me that here a morality exists beyond Christianity, one that approches criminal legality. Isn't it, what do you think?
|
|
Bookmarks