(computer software) |
|
(computer software) |
|
I think it's impractical to expect to reach a level that the "naturals" have, but you CAN train to speedread. I think "not liking to read books" will affect your progress, though. Let's face it, no matter how nice the program you ordered is, the bottom line is, to learn to speed-read, you'll have to read - a lot. And printed books are just nicer on your eyes. |
|
Call me old fashion. Isn't reading mean't to be slow, what is the point of reading something and forgetting it |
|
I got a book out on speed reading and it focused alot on keeping the eyes more still and being able to see a wider range. I'm already good at skimming, and if I'm reading I prefer to go slow and be able to stop and think about it and basically think and read at the same time. Speedreading would be helpful for giant business work though, although it would probably be good to understand it lol. I prefer not to have to work to read better. The book made a big deal about all the time you save when reading books for pleasure throughout the year but I would prefer to get the meanings and feelings of the books rather then just learn the storyline. If it beneficial to you though, what do you have to lose (besides alot of money on the dang programs lol). |
|
You may also want to search this Forum for Photo reading. |
|
Well it could be lieing, but it is supposed to actually help comprehension... |
|
I think it depends on the density of the material. If you're reading "Godel, Escher, Bach" or something, then you'll have to slow down. But if you're reading harry potter, you can probably speed read and not miss too much detail. It's like lossy compression (e.g. jpeg). The loss of quality is negligible compared to the amazing savings in file size. |
|
Bookmarks