Thread: Photoshop-type programs for poor souls...

Originally Posted by Marvo

GIMP can certainly do things, but the seperated windows pisses me so much of, and everything is just confusing. Why did they make an entire gigantic window for layers?! So dumb.

Hey marvo, can you PM about Photoshop?

Noo, that would be illegal


Add me on MSN [email protected]

Originally Posted by Seismosaur

I admit photoshop is cleaner, and easier, but hey, you can't really beat free for me .

Wait, you charge?

edit: oh wait; I read that wrong.

Joking. Sorry for the off topic and off beat humor

Originally Posted by Xaqaria

Wait, you charge?

edit: oh wait; I read that wrong.

Joking. Sorry for the off topic and off beat humor

This is TechTalk. We all mean serial bussiness!!!

looks like the photoshop UI may become more gimp-like

Blog entry from John Nack, senior product manager at Adobe
looking at overhauling the Photoshop user interface

http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2007/11...hop_as_se.html

Also, too I look at Piknik and all the other online photo editing spring-ups (a la Photoshop Express) that have elegantly and simply adapted their UIs by NOT being an end-all, be-all. Maybe take a look at GIMP or Picasa and see why "everyday" users like them.

I don't really see too much wrong with Photoshop to be honest though, why would they want to change it/ I have never used these free programs before, are they really that different to use?

Originally Posted by Adam

I don't really see too much wrong with Photoshop to be honest though, why would they want to change it/ I have never used these free programs before, are they really that different to use?

Oh yeah. Photoshop is waaaaay better then GIMP. GIMP is different to use then photoshop for just about everything.

But hey, GIMP is free.

Originally Posted by Rasenganxxchidori

Oh yeah. Photoshop is waaaaay better then GIMP. GIMP is different to use then photoshop for just about everything.

But hey, GIMP is free.

Actually, photoshop and GIMP are quite a lot a like.

GIMP is different to use then photoshop for just about everything.

And what the hell does that mean?

std::

Originally Posted by Seismosaur

Actually, photoshop and GIMP are quite a lot a like.

Um, no. NO.
That's like saying " Clinton and W. Bush are pretty much alike, I mean, they're both presidents right?"
Gimp is like the retarded cousin of Photoshop.

Originally Posted by Seismosaur

And what the hell does that mean?

std::

Dude, chill out.

Originally Posted by Rasenganxxchidori

GIMP is different to use

This means it is not the same when using it...

Originally Posted by Rasenganxxchidori

then photoshop for

I don't know how to put this simpler.

Originally Posted by Rasenganxxchidori

just about everything.

Almost anything you do with it.

Is that simple enough to understand now?

Everybody relax. The entire point of this thread is that at the end of the day, I personally cannot afford photoshop and will have to suck it up and waste a few more brain cells understanding GIMP.

Originally Posted by Rasenganxxchidori

Um, no. NO.
That's like saying " Clinton and W. Bush are pretty much alike, I mean, they're both presidents right?"
Gimp is like the retarded cousin of Photoshop.


Dude, chill out.

This means it is not the same when using it...

I don't know how to put this simpler.

Almost anything you do with it.

Is that simple enough to understand now?

It made no sense in the first place.

GI think you meant: GIMP and photoshop are used differently for the same things.

or

GIMP and photoshop are used differently for different things.

Originally Posted by Seismosaur

It made no sense in the first place.

GI think you meant: GIMP and photoshop are used differently for the same things.

or

GIMP and photoshop are used differently for different things.

Typo, than vs. then. I think you still knew what I meant. Or at least I hope you did...

Logic

Originally Posted by Seismosaur

GIMP and photoshop are used differently for different things.

This makes no sense. If they were used for different things, then of course they would be used differently.

Thus... The only option can be...

Originally Posted by Seismosaur

GIMP and photoshop are used differently for the same things.

Ding Ding Ding! There you go. I already explained it though, mate.

Originally Posted by Rasenganxxchidori

Typo, than vs. then. I think you still knew what I meant. Or at least I hope you did...

Logic



This makes no sense. If they were used for different things, then of course they would be used differently.

Thus... The only option can be...

Ding Ding Ding! There you go. I already explained it though, mate.

You really didn't read those two sentences, did you?

Originally Posted by Seismosaur

You really didn't read those two sentences, did you?

Could you be a little more vague?

Or do you want me to re-explain it... again...