Originally Posted by dylanshmai
you guys don't know anything about me. except for my opinion on this matter which I think is complete wankery, which is completely normal, but not musical. You wouldn't be able to guess who I was in real life, you wouldn't know. I might have gotten a bit confused on what band was what, because you guys showed me about 4. jhon zorn did some jazz stuff. That asian band was going to a 4 step some of the time, except for the inserts of distortion, which no one wants to listen to, or doesn't care enough at the time to call it anything but music (which is what it is). I define music, by the skill, time, notes played, and most importantly of all: the construction of the music, and the writing that goes into it, that is just as much apart of music, and these songs lack just that.
You say you've taught people guitar lessons, so have I. I've been in all sorts of bands, and have written over a 100 songs. blah blah blah. Can, you guys even tell me the kind of emotional impact these tunes have on you? or what kind of essence it holds? happy? sad? angry? dark? I can't even tell because its so muddy, and the effect steals the show with repetitive bumps in the same tone range. flanger, phaser, whatever it is, is fucking annoying to me.
its my opinion against everybody elses what can I say, everyone thinks differently.
I informed you about my guitar experience not to try and get one up on you but to point out your ludicrous conclusion that i don't write music, and to let you know that i know all about lazy bedroom guitar playing so you don't need to play that card. So likewise, you don't know anything about me, as you assumed you did.
I respect your view of what music is, i have no problem with that, but i do have a problem with you entering a thread and tearing certain styles of music apart and telling people they don't know what music is. I've been getting worked up in this thread because of the fact that you don't seem to understand that your view of music is not what everybody else's view of music is. Can't you just accept that, for other people, music doesn't necessitate technical skill, conventional structure, time? Fair enough if it does for you, but nobody's definitions are a universal law, including yours. The question of "What is art?" changes from person to person. I don't care that you voiced an opinion in this thread, it's the way you voiced that opinion - you were rude and crass and holier-than-thou about it. If it was constructive criticism it would be a different story.
As for emotional impact: The first time i heard AMM (droney free improvisation) i was blown away. I felt excited. I wanted to go outside into the sun and experience the day, and i did. Merzbow (noise) has the uncanny ability to pump me up or calm me down, depending on my state of mind at the time. His music can be soothing and it makes me happy. Borbetomagus can bring me to life, so to speak, compel me into motion. They can also put me in a reflective and sombre frame of mind. That is what music is about in my mind. At the end of the day it doesn't matter whether you're playing in some scale, whether your song has an acceptable structure, whether you're playing to a beat or any like that. If a piece of music can make me feel something (anything!) it's acceptable enough. I can get that from Beethoven, i can get it from Dream Theater, i can get it from Kate Bush, i can get it from Miles Davis, but i can get it in equal amounts from the other music mentioned here in this thread. I get that you can't, but that doesn't exclude it from being musical and emotionally rewarding to others. I think you need to learn to respect that.
|
|
Bookmarks