On the subject of not moving...
The exact same thing happens to a lot of meditators, they too can "get past the pain barrier" so to speak, but this does not result in them having sleep paralysis, nor does it mean they fall asleep. Instead they remain in a relaxed medatative state, with an awake mind, and awake body.
It seems to me to be pretty obvious, that if one turns one attention inwards, and cuts of most sensory input, either via meditation or lucid dream WILD practices... the mind will latch onto any small urges, and magnify them into an almost compulsive desire to give them your full attention.
I don't think this is any kind of testing system, I imagine it's akin to sitting in a completely bare room, with nothing but a red rose in the corner... of course your attention is going to be drawn again and again to the one piece of stimuli, the rose, or in the case of meditation and WILDs bodily sensations and itches.
This of course will be even more hightened if part of your practice or what you've been taught tells you to "ignore" them... because it suddenly becomes part of what you expect, and something you want to avoid... which ironically primes your awareness to notice it.
Of course if you ignore something long enough, it will pass, that's just life.
Does that mean you've "passed a test"?
I don't think so.
What you have done, is moved into a state of deeper relaxation, where your attention can settle down. Personally, I think the same thing can be achived by simply not giving any importance to the body, and just relaxing in the normal way you'd fall asleep (as in just getting comfy).
But to me, the fact that meditators get the very same experience, yet do not fall into deep sleep or sleep paralysis even though they too ignore it... is kind of enough evidence to prove that it's not some kind of special testing system, and instead just a natural example of magnified awareness.
On the subject of Lucidology.
I fully agree with Mitch.
I'd go one step further and say:
Not only is lucidology sneaky in the fact that it contains small elements of truth... but it also then goes on to seemingly build upon that truth with nonsense... but people believe the nonsense, because it had a seed of truth in it initially.
I've no problem with people making money from a subject, I have huge respect for Laberge and other dream researchers.
The difference between them and Newport, is that they have some kind of integrity. They stick with the facts, make it clear when they are speculating, and educate in a sensible, intelligent fashion.
Newport on the other hand, pretty much behaves like he is the final word, "knows it all", and then spews out a load of meaningless pseudo-science and made up terminology... all of which is basically nonsense.
In an attempt to confuse and bamboozle the naive and gullable into parting with their money.
Sure he may have a few bits of knowledge, but no more than any member of DreamViews. In fact, I'd say he knows less... because he is so caught up in his lucid-dream-messiah complex, that I expect he has even started to believe his own nonsense.
I just feel sorry for the newcomers to the subject, we were all naive to lucid dreaming once upon a time. And it's very easy to be sucked in by confident sales men, selling sparkly "perfect" systems. But as the old saying goes... If it sounds too good to be true, then it probably is.
Newport needs to go back to school and study some basic psychology and biology rather than just confidently pretending he understands.
|
|
Bookmarks