Cloud, this is the best description of lucidity I've seen so far. Thank you for writing it, it is a great reminder. |
|
Hello, |
|
no sig
Cloud, this is the best description of lucidity I've seen so far. Thank you for writing it, it is a great reminder. |
|
Thank you Cloud, I appreciate this. I understand what you mean about detachment, I'm glad you made it a point to mention it. I was surprised that some expressed an opinion that your post may be confusing to novices -- I'm inexperienced, yet you actually helped clarify some things for me. I thank you again. |
|
That's because for most newbies, it will be confusing. I can tell from reading most of the posts on this thread that an unsettling majority aren't completely understanding what ClouD is getting at. On the surface, it appears to be a suggested method for obtaining lucidity, but really it's a challenge, a discourse on the possible fallibility of the definition so widely and fervently taught by the community at large. |
|
What might seem as an idea to you, is experience for me. Not to sound corny, but I don't consider it an idea. I'm speaking from my experience, which often concurs with other peoples' experiences. |
|
Last edited by ClouD; 12-01-2010 at 08:22 PM.
You merely have to change your point of view slightly, and then that glass will sparkle when it reflects the light.
Bookmarks