Aerokenesis-Electokenesis-Hydrokenesis Does anyone know how?

[GateKeEper12]

Well these ones intrest me most of all kenesis and psionics in general , are they even actual real psionic abilities?

[Syntex]

Uhhhhhhh.... ??? I don't recall being able to bend my spoon lately... but I guess so.

[Waking Life]

I'm still learning psionics. (I'm trying to devote more time to my development with psi, but I'm currently working on LD, AP, and meditation as well.) As far as I believe, kenises is possible. I haven't personally done it myself, but I've read some literature that could back up it's possibility. I've read into string theory, and how it links to all of the nonlocal arts (meditation, AP, and Psi.) If you have no idea what string theory is, then I don't want to sit down and try to explain it all, but it's a new physics theory of everything. We are to atoms, as atoms are to these little strings of vibrating energy, and this energy is in everything. It is a boundless, infinity where time and space do not exist. Through our primitive three dimensional view point, we think that we are seperate beings. But according to string theory, everything is connected, and everything is simply these miniute energy strings vibrating at different frequencies. So, there is no seperation, say, between me and the spoon that I want to bend. So, it makes fundamental sense that I would be able to bend it realitively easily, as long as I focused my minds, and in turn, my energy. It's really a long, long description, but I hope that helped in some way. Check out this if your are interested: Stalking the wild pendulum: On the mechanics of Consciousness By Itzhak Bentov

[evangel]

So, there is no seperation, say, between me and the spoon that I want to bend. So, it makes fundamental sense that I would be able to bend it realitively easily, as long as I focused my minds, and in turn, my energy. [/b] That's also assuming that there are no outside influences or forces that restrict or govern such "energy." Such theories are interesting, yet they still have a fundamental flaw in that they often assume that there are no OTHER energies that we cannot detect with physical instruments or human sense or knowledge.

[tryagain]

Well these ones intrest me most of all kenesis and psionics in general Surprised , are they even actual real psionic abilities?[/b] well, they're supposed to work, after you've mastered psiballs and telekinesis. I think pyrokinesis is supposed to be easy too. Those other three you've mentioned are advanced, I think. Not that it worked for me. I've tried to do it a few times and gave up.

[Waking Life]

That's also assuming that there are no outside influences or forces that restrict or govern such \"energy.\" Such theories are interesting, yet they still have a fundamental flaw in that they often assume that there are no OTHER energies that we cannot detect with physical instruments or human sense or knowledge. [/b] Well, it would be the base of all energy and force. Once you find something smaller than one billionth the size of an atom, let me know

[evangel]

I wasn't talking about size. I was talking about detectability. All too often people who use science as the final ultimatum or authority forget that truth and science are often eventually proven not to be synonymous - as history has shown again and again... This is more of a philosophical argument I suppose and a pretty big tangent but I just had to get that in. I was originally attracted by this thread because I was hoping to find out what "aero, electro, and hydrokinesis" are. Can anyone explain?

[tryagain]

yeah, I can. don't take me as a psi-nerd though aerokinesis- controlling the air with your powers hydro- controlling water, like making ripples with your mind powers pyro- controlling fire and its movements electro- controlling electric, like turning lights on without touching the switch telekinesis- ablility to move things like picking up pencils with yoru mind powers

[Tsen]

Originally posted by evangel truth and science are often eventually proven not to be synonymous - as history has shown again and again Care to provide resources? If history has shown it so often, where's the proof? I've asked time and time again, and I just want resources. Now, don't go bashing science's veracity, because science is rarely wrong, merely incomplete. We're still learning, and trying to understand. Meanwhile, counter-culture fanatics go saying that we're wrong on every level. Hell, if it wasn't for science, you wouldn't be able to make up these 'electrokinesis' things. Electricity wasn't an accepted fact until around the 17th century, and was ridiculed at the time by people, who, like you, refused to believe the evidence under their noses. And now, here you are, bashing science as untrue, while shoving forward your incomplete and unbased claims wrought from twisted and mutilated sciences that were not long ago bashed in turn by your own kin. Science at least is trying to explain things, while you guys sit here in the Beyond Dreaming forum and talk about how reality is beyond discription and therefore not worth proving. Once again I call you all to get off your arses and prove it. And once again I'll be met with half-way remarks and ridicule.

[evangel]

Originally posted by Tsen Care to provide resources? If history has shown it so often, where's the proof? I've asked time and time again, and I just want resources. What was once seen as science FICTION is continually and increasingly becoming science \"fact\". AND some things once considered true in light of science are now known as untruths. Again, this is tangential and a never-ending discussion with many factors and issues to debate, so it may be more worthy of pm... Now, don't go bashing science's veracity, because science is rarely wrong, merely incomplete.[/b] \"Incomplete\" also implies \"complete.\" One mistake that many people make is assuming that there will eventually be a point of \"completion\" - as if science is leading us to some point in the future where we will \"know it all.\" In truth, the more you know, the more you know you DON'T know. My point is not so much to bash \"science's veracity\" as it is to say don't confuse science with some inane ability to arrive at absolute truth. In other words, don't deify it. It is what it is and it's ALWAYS fluctuating, and NOT always \"building on itself\" as so many try to argue. Meanwhile, counter-culture fanatics go saying that we're wrong on every level. Hell, if it wasn't for science, you wouldn't be able to make up these 'electrokinesis' things. Electricity wasn't an accepted fact until around the 17th century, and was ridiculed at the time by people, who, like you, refused to believe the evidence under their noses.[/b] FYI: I didn't make it up, yo. And I suppose you would like to have placed yourself among \"the people\" who accepted electricity as good and knew it to be good before the 17th century. Can't get more presumptuous than that! And now, here you are, bashing science as untrue, while shoving forward your incomplete and unbased claims wrought from twisted and mutilated sciences that were not long ago bashed in turn by your own kin. [/b] My kin? I only have one brother... I think before you get all bent outta shape my fren, you need to look above. Science at least is trying to explain things, while you guys sit here in the Beyond Dreaming forum and talk about how reality is beyond discription and therefore not worth proving. Once again I call you all to get off your arses and prove it. And once again I'll be met with half-way remarks and ridicule.[/b] Whoa, NELLY! WHOA! We're just talking about kinesis, yo. No one that I know said that these things are scientifically verifiable "facts" This is discussion about dreams and dream content. I have dreams many times where I can control the air or the weather at will, sometimes produce fire from my hands at will, cause lightning bolts to strike at will and control water in the same way as air... Most of the time, though these end up in some sort of destruction or harm, so if possible I try to stay away from them and have found that they tend to occur when I feel threatened as if I have somehow learned these things by instinct rather than conscious or proactive will.

[Kaniaz]

Oh yea?. Well, james randi.

[Tsen]

This thread is about kinesis in REAL LIFE. I'm sorry if you thought otherwise--I, too use 'superpowers' in dreams. But this is the Beyond Dreaming forum, and little relating to dreaming is to be found here (relative to the rest of the site). If the topic was how to use Aero, Electro and Hydro kinesis in dreams, it fits much better into the Dream Control forum. As to referring to your kin, it was a figure of speech. I was referring to all of these people getting together and chatting excitedly about these outlandish ideas.

[evangel]

Ayeet. I tink you and I agree then: If there are people who experience these types of kinesis "in real life," then I'm a horse with feathers and gills. I knew "kin" was a figure of speech. I resent anyone referring to my kin when they don't have a clue as to who I or my kin are.

[dexster3k]

alright, science is obviously something we shouldn't just write off...I mean it's our (humans) only way of explaining things that we experience....but..it definetely has flaws...science is only good enough to explain the things that are happening as we understand them...there's no why in science...that's its major flaw...we figure out why things happen and once we do that we completely write off any kind of reason for why it's happening...but I suppose it's the best we can do..but it doesn't mean it's the ultimate answer...our ignorance prevents us from that

[Tsen]

Awesome, sorry 'bout the misunderstanding. Good to know we're on the same side -Tsen