Thanks Universal Mind, however I don't think I really got into the bulk of my Intelligent Design argument, bluefinger was right I really didn't present much of a good argument for ID, I backtracked several times into Evolution and Abiogenesis and I shouldn't have. I didn't really get around to the basis of information, which I really feel it presents a great deal of strength for my argument. I think I'm going to start a new thread just on ID and information because I have a lot to explain. |
|
I look forward to that thread, however, in the mean time, here's something that came up in the NewScientist recently is actually an amazing find: |
|
Last edited by bluefinger; 06-12-2008 at 12:21 AM.
-Bluefinger v1.25- Enter the madness that are my dreams (DJ Update, non-LD)
"When you reject the scientific method in order to believe what you want, you know that you have failed at life. Sorry, but there is no justification, no matter how wordy you make it."
- Xei
DILD: 6, WILD: 1
haven't watched it yet but I liked the title. "Foolish Atheists" |
|
Bookmarks