Thread: Do you think 9/11 was staged?

Originally Posted by cmind

Building 7 was actually a controlled demolition due to damage suffered from the collapse of 1 and 2.

You are half correct. A controlled demolition yes. But not because it was somehow damaged. Fires have never before or since destroyed a steel skyscraper. What should disturb you about this is two things. Firstly it's impossible to plan a controlled demolition in the space of a few hours from when the attacks happened. No-one would admit its normal to plan a demolition of building 7 days before the towers were even attacked. The attack had not even happened when they would have had to set it up the demolition. If you realized that and were not bias and more sensible you might have the ability to stop and think "hang on what was even inside building 7 and what was it used for?".

Buildng 7 : At the time of its destruction, it exclusively housed government agencies and financial institutions. It contained offices of the IRS, Secret Service, and SEC.

I would also add that to say such a thing as cmind has said bout wtc7 without thinking anything is suspicious you would have to fail to grasp the technical complexity of engineering the controlled demolition of a skyscraper and its contradiction with FEMA's account of the collapse, and the illegality of such an operation. But people will believe anything that suits them so its not always about what makes sense but what they want to believe. So even if such a thing was grasped, they may want to ignore it.