 Originally Posted by Dianeva
It isn't just one or the other. There are different levels. Someone's goal in explaining something might not at all be attention-seeking, yet the feeling of validation is still part of the result. For example, if I'm knowledgeable about a topic and discuss it with someone because I'm genuinely interested in it, the primary goal is not to gain attention. Yet there almost always exists something in me that feels good for being judged as intelligent by anyone observing the conversation, and is almost constantly aware of what people's impressions of me as a person will be.
Millions of years of evolution in a situation where humans lived in small tribes where reputation was very important will do that. Regardless, it doesn't matter if you get a warm fuzzy feeling from showing off your intellect, and it doesn't matter if you pay attention to how people are responding. As long as your primary motivation is something other than drawing attention to yourself, then it isn't attention-seeking. It's all about intent.
I didn't think anyone wasn't aware of that thread.
What is the release, exactly, in ranting about one's day to other people? Is it not that they feel they'll receive validation about their problems from those other people, and is that not the same as a cry for attention?
I don't tend to read outside ED much these days.
Where's the release in ranting? Simply by expressing the view in the first place. It's metaphorically punching something in frustration to make themselves feel better. If you're doing it to be validated by others, yes that's attention-seeking (and if you actually want feedback on whether you were wrong then you're not going to ask for it in a one-sided rant). If it's just to express your anger and get it out your system, no it's not a cry for attention
|
|
Bookmarks