All hail Frankbot.
I feel like I've entered a very tacky and poorly written Asimov story.
Printable View
All hail Frankbot.
I feel like I've entered a very tacky and poorly written Asimov story.
Here is the fundamental, ultimate, general, natural, actual, and theoretical unification of physics and physical experience
Dream experience grows/increases. Moreover, it is separate from, and yet it is also fundamentally linked with, waking experience. Dreams involve the fundamental experience of our growth and becoming other than we are in conjunction with an essential and fundamental mastery of physics and physical experience.
Importantly, vision begins invisibly inside the eye/body. Invisible and visible space in fundamental equilibrium and balance in dreams is consistent with the experience of the middle distance in/of space (including seen and felt/touched) in conjunction with quantum gravity and fundamentally equivalent and balanced gravity, electromagnetism, and inertia. Dreams necessarily involve half gravity and half inertia in conjunction with fundamentally equivalent and balanced gravity, inertia, and electromagnetism. Therefore, dream experience is that of the middle distance in/of space in keeping with fundamentally balanced and middle strength feeling/touch/force/energy. Accordingly, the maximum of balanced force/energy/feeling/touch in dreams is half in comparison with the feeling/touch that is experienced at the feet (at what is also the visible Earth/ground) while waking and standing. Comparatively, we are talking about a range of feeling/touch; as full gravity is full distance in/of space as it is seen, felt, and touched. Notice the fundamentally balanced half or middle strength gravity, inertia, and electromagnetism in dreams that necessarily involves the middle distance in/of space (including half gravity and half inertia of necessity).
It is a great truth/fact that the self represents, forms, and experiences a comprehensive approximation of experience in general by combining conscious and unconscious experience. Dream experience is consistent with the most fundamental and great truth/fact that the self represents, forms, and experiences a comprehensive approximation of experience in general by combining conscious and unconscious experience. Indeed, if the self did not represent, form, and experience a comprehensive approximation of experience in general by combining conscious and unconscious experience, we would then be incapable of growth and of becoming other than we are. Dreams involve the fundamental experience of our growth and becoming other than we are. There is no outsmarting the genius of dreams.
By Frank DiMeglio
^^ Oh look, another robopost! I think they only appear if someone else posts first... and if two of us post, then two roboposts seem to appear.
I wonder if Frank realizes yet that these posts are likely no longer being read, and certainly aren't selling books for him?
Site Administrator, can you delete the worthless posts which do not contain anything other than repetitive personal insults? Really, that is not what this is supposed to be about here, is it?
Author Frank DiMeglio
Oh wow this is brilliant. Everything we postulate seems to be true. Though I haven't yet figured out the pattern he follows when turning certain words to bold.
Frank seems to be particularly prone to bolding the words, and; vision and invisible. Unusually though, his complaint posts seems to have changed from being all bolds to no bolds. Perhaps it has to do with electromagnetism?
I wonder if the actual Author Frank DiMeglio ever looks at this, his thread, and if he's then inclined to respond directly -- or at least beg his publicist's programmer to back off a bit on the bold, caps, and slashes... maybe the best he could get was a robocomplaint sans bold?
And Frank, if you ever do read this thread, I hope you understand that these snarky posts of ours are actually making a point, and with all due respect we might be the sincere ones here: to repeatedly post your advertising-billboard-buy-my-book hyperbolic proclamations here, and then call our observation of said posts "insults" is disingenuous at best. You might want to rethink your next book launch, and at least make it a bit more personable.
If you bump your own thread without responding to questions asking for clarification on the more nonsensical aspects of your posts it makes you a poor contributor and a poor author. If you want to talk at a wall, start a blog. This is a forum, we have conversations here.
I'm sorry but the original poster strikes me as one of those people who are trying to cash in on dreaming, without really having a genuine passion for the topic himself - this is evident in the way he goes on about how he "knows" that things are "definitely" certain ways, and that we "must" buy this book as soon as possible.
Try to be more humble and passionate about dreaming as a topic for its own sake next time, maybe mention that you are writing a book about it and would like to hear other people's opinions or something like that.
Inertial and gravitational equivalency and balancing fundamentally explained in our waking experience
When waking and standing full gravity is full distance in/of space as it is seen, felt, and touched. Consider the visible Earth/ground. Now, the space above it involves visible and invisible space in fundamental equilibrium and balance. This is the middle distance in/of space, and it is half gravity and half inertia. Outer space is full inertia.
senseless droning of the words fact, truth, and proof do not your assertions make sir. if you have a theory, state it as such and your credibility will not suffer. would you sell a novel, with the cover replaced by that of another/more famous novel? no, because that would be misleading and bad for business. I don't usually disregard someone's ideas before discussing my concerns regarding specific points of their argument, but you struck a nerve my friend.
I do echo Dutchraptor's sentiment that the most educationally beneficial aspect of this thread is the potential of deriving an algorithm to define the pattern in which you utilize capital words, bolded words, and synonyms adjoined by an oblique. the last one is particularly puzzling to me. did I miss a memo about a new, completely useless literary device from the department of redundancy department? :uhm:
If you stop posting, he will. He only replies whenever someone drags it back up. So just stop doing that.
^^ Sounds like a plan.
Maybe then the next post here will be from the actual, living, Frank DiMeglia, wherein he will apologize for the babble inadvertently wrought by his errant spambot... or defends it in plain English, if by some chance he thinks this stuff makes sense.
All we have to do is wait around for Frank to realize his program -- or his publicist, anyway -- has gone off the trail.
was so disoriented by all the undeniable truth that I did not realize a Frankbot was inciting a riot in the thread, my apologies
Normally I would delete spam and advertisement without asking, but this is more like anti-advertisement for said book, lol. And you guys seem to be having fun. Lemme know when you done. Happy dreams ya'all.
Tech Administrator, how do you get around all of the following and the rest of what I have written here in this thread? This is a very, very important discussion. That is obvious.
Dreams involve the fundamental experience of our growth and becoming other than we are.
Dreams involve invisible and visible space in fundamental equilibrium and balance. This is consistent with quantum gravity, the middle distance in/of space, inertia and gravity in fundamental equilibrium and balance, and a maximum of half or middle strength feeling/touch/force/energy.
Tech Administrator, Site Administrator, and other readers:
Again, this thread is super important.
As yet further proof of this, under General Dream Discussion, please see: Clear proof that dreams are the fundamental and essential source/manifestation of genius by Frank DiMeglio
Let's keep these two discussions/threads separate, of course. Thank you. Can we get any serious, mature, and realistic responses to what I have written here please? Thanks.
Why we can understand dreams and their connection with television
We came alive in conjunction with our growth and becoming other than we are. This growth, survival, and experience was ongoing/continuous. This involves an essential and fundamental mastery of physics and physical experience. An essential balance between being and experience is necessarily involved. Dream experience grows/increases. Dreams involve the fundamental experience of our growth and becoming other than we are. I have proven that dreams fundamentally and ultimately unify and balance gravity, inertia, and electromagnetism (seen, felt, and touched). Dream experience is fundamentally linked with waking experience. Dreams cannot be held to only constitute separate experiences. Dream experience is possible/potential and actual.
Since the ability of thought to describe or reconfigure sensory experience is ultimately dependent upon the extent to which thought is similar to sensory experience, dream experience can be fundamentally understood in an integrated and sensible fashion. How do you think that dream experience makes us smarter and improves upon our memory? The ability of thought to describe or reconfigure sensory experience is ultimately dependent upon the extent to which thought is similar to sensory experience is applicable to both television and dreams.
Whereas dreams make thought more like sensory experience in general, thereby improving upon memory and understanding; television makes thought fully like thought. I have fundamentally proven why television has significant and adverse effects. Television is a creation of thought (sight and sound) consistent with the fact that it is fundamentally and fully similar to (or fully like) thought. Television is a form, type, or manifestation of hallucination. I have fundamentally and truly proven this. It is quite obvious, in fact, that it is. This is a serious problem. Television is a serious problem.
Tech Admiminstrator, why is the following incorrect?
VISION begins INVISIBLY inside the eye/body. Dream experience involves gravity, inertia, and electromagnetism in fundamental equilibrium and balance. Dream experience involves fundamentally equivalent and BALANCED middle strength FORCE/ENERGY/FEELING/TOUCH consistent with what is half inertia and half gravity and the experience of the middle distance in/of space. Invisible and visible space in fundamental equilibrium and balance IS the middle distance in/of space (including seen, felt, AND touched). During waking experience while standing, FULL GRAVITY is full distance in/of space as it is seen, felt, AND touched. We always begin with simple, natural, typical, ordinary, and foundational/fundamental experience(s) in establishing physical fundamentals/truths. What is of concern here is the range of feeling/touch. (Notice that gravity cannot be shielded.)
Now, and VERY IMPORTANTLY, the maximum of feeling/touch/force/energy that is ACTUALLY experienced in dreams IS HALF of that in comparison to waking experience while standing. This constitutes excellent, substantial, fundamental, undeniable, clear, and foundational PROOF.
It all makes sense. This entire picture is consistent, complete, and clear.
There is no outsmarting the genius of dreams.
Position AND position relative to distance in/of space are BOTH united here. This is necessary for inertial and gravitational equivalency and balancing.
FrankDiMeglio
Is this a fair condensing of what you said in your opening post?
Proof of what dreams really are.
Why dreams unify physics: and Proof that dreams are not a creation of thought.
Dreams turn thought into sensory experience improving memory and understanding.
Dream experience is important BECAUSE dreams are consistent with the following fundamental truths:
1) - The ability of thought to become sensory experience happens because thought is similar to sensory experience.*
2) - The self is a condensed solution of experience caused by combining conscious and unconscious experience.
If the self was not this we would not be incapable of growth or of becoming other than we are.
DREAMS INVOLVE THE FUNDAMENTAL EXPERIENCE OF OUR GROWTH AND BECOMING OTHER THAN WE ARE.
Thoughts are integrated and interactive with our experience of feeling and touch etc.
However, thoughts are also detached and different in relation to this at the same time.
This is why thought is not a visual experience. Thoughts are invisible.
Thought best describes sensory experience when space is invisible and visible in an equilibrium.
The ability of thought to describe OR reconfigure sensory experience is dependent upon the extent to which thought is similar to sensory experience.
The self happens by combining conscious and unconscious experience.
Television is similar to thought.
For example:
thoughts are different to visual experience.
Therefore,
teleVISION is a creation of thought that is flattened in comparison with what would otherwise be the naturally integrated and interactive
...umm
distance in and of space, in dreams, and in waking experience.
Accordingly, television is DETACHED from touch.
Moreover, television does take the real form of ELECTROMAGNETISM.
This is proof that TV is a very serious problem.
We are alive in a dream experience and are experiencing our growth and fundamentally becoming more than what we presently, are.
This involves a mastery of physics (i.e., a fundamental balancing of gravity, inertia, and electromagnetism)
AND
physical experience (including experience as it is seen, felt, AND touched).
Dream experience is semi-detached from touch, and half the gravity of waking life.in our waking experience, there is full distance in and of space.
Dream experience is that of the MIDDLE distance in/of space in keeping with invisible and visible space in fundamental equilibrium and balance.
Dreams are also accurately described and understood as emotional experience. Indeed, emotion that is balanced advances consciousness.
Becoming "one with the music" is linked with the fact that emotion that is comprehensive and balanced advances consciousness.
There is no outsmarting the genius of dreams.
We all grow from the center of the human body.
Relative to waking experience, dreams do involve a reduction of both thought and feeling.
Emotion is BETWEEN (and in the MIDDLE of) thought and feeling.
Dreams are not a creation of thought. I have proven this definitively. Our "experts" do not know what dreams are.
I HAVE PROVEN THIS.
(...)
What I did to half of your Opening Post (above) by taking out some repetition and separating the ideas. I do this to Everything I study. I like what I have absorbed from yoir work so far. It takes me three time as long (as average people) to learn things.
Did I get the gist of what you originally posted? Remember that I am a bit intellectually slow so if you reply please take that into account.
Thanks for your questions and comments. First, here are some of the bare essentials which will focus, clarify, and ground this matter fundamentally:
Dreams involve a balance of being and experience, as they involve the fundamental experience of our growth and becoming other than we are. Clearly, our growth and becoming other than we are was necessary in order for us to ultimately be here. We fundamentally came alive in conjunction with our growth and becoming other than we are. Moreover, our growth, survival, and experience were ongoing/continuous. Dreams involve an essential and fundamental mastery of physics and physical experience. (Dream experience grows/increases.) Accordingly, dream experience and waking experience are fundamentally and necessarily linked; and yet they are separate experiences as well.
Thought best or ultimately describes sensory experience when space is invisible and visible in fundamental equilibrium and balance.
Invisible and visible space in fundamental equilibrium and balance IS the middle distance in/of space. This means half gravity and half inertia. This is a gigantic point, and it consitutes a major and undeniable breakthrough in physics.
Please try to first understand the ideas as I have written them. There is a huge amount of information to digest here, so please be patient. I am giving your other questions further consideration and reflection. I will get back to you. Full sentences may be linked with other sentences, and that is a good idea. Start with the biggest or most foundational/fundamental ideas first, and then go from there.
I gladly welcome questions and comments. Thanks.
OpheliaBlue, Administrator, what do you think of all of this please?